Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB

Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/)
-   Travellers' questions that don't fit anywhere else (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/travellers-questions-dont-fit-anywhere/)
-   -   Wrong way down? (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/travellers-questions-dont-fit-anywhere/wrong-way-down-30266)

mustaphapint 11 Dec 2007 12:50

well said Dakota

MarkE 11 Dec 2007 13:23

Seconded
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by harleyrider (Post 162979)
well said Dakota

Seconded!

Jan - I saw the DVD in a local supermarket here in the UK last weekend so it should be with you in NL soon (I'm tight fisted so I'm waiting to see if the price drops in the new year from the price I saw, which was equivalent to 150 miles worth of fuel.

MarkE 11 Dec 2007 13:32

It could work Cami
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 162433)
No-one would watch it if those women did it. No-one has heard of them.

Not sure that would be a stopper. If you look at how food porn programmes have developed over the years:

First there was Fanny Craddock.

Then any aspiring chef wanted a series (the career progress ran from open restaurant, next publish cook book then get TV series).

Now anyone who ever made beans on toast for their flat mates gets a cookery programme (Nigella? Hairy bikers?? The surfer types?!?).

If LWD was popular enough (I'm too lazy to waste my lunch hour looking for audience stats) they might be ready for stage 2, where the likes of HUBB posters could be equal to aspiring chefs?

I'm available for a series if anyone from a TV production company is reading. All I ask is that they arrange a nice shiny new bike, all the necessary kit, someone to organise paperwork, and a salary equal to what I earn now (not a great deal as it goes). Baldie Biker does Bulgaria anyone?

Caminando 12 Dec 2007 14:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 162968)
What is it with all this Charley and Ewan bashing? At the risk of repeating myself (I posted on the OTHER Charley and Ewan thread) has everybody missed the point?

I watched the last 3 episodes back to back last night because I thought I'd been watching some other series. So much criticism from so many - why did you take the time & effort to watch the series (and in some cases take the time to download it) in the first place? Are you not rational enough to realise this is a show, featuring showmen, produced by a production company for the masses? Do you believe everything the papers and politicians tell you as well? Where is this programme advertised as a show exclusively for adventure motorcyclists and who are we to define what makes an adventure motorcyclist?

I find it interesting that the general theme that runs through this thread is about Charley's antics. Almost 200 posts and only half a dozen vague references to the charity work they did.

Not one mention of:
  • the terminally ill children and their families at the Hospice in Scotland;
  • the mass murder of 5,000 people in one day at the church in Rwanda - killed by machete's, hammers, guns and burnt alive - all the skulls (one with a spear still embedded and others smashed in) and bloodied clothes of those victims still there - a stark contrast to the Church of Bones;
  • the children kidnapped from their families at an early age, some as young as 3, and forced to fight against and beat to death their fellow villagers if they didn't conform - children killing children;
  • the boys who are circumcised without anaesthetic and being forbidden to display any sort of emotion or pain for fear of bringing shame upon their family;
  • the mass murder at the school of all those tiny innocent children and the horrific wounds from bullets and machetes of the surviving children;
  • the orphans who have lost their parents to HIV and Aids;
  • the medics they had with them who tended the woman who had given birth the day before, or the guy with severe diarrhoea who had collapsed.

Was Charley's fart-lighting and wheelie-pulling that much more memorable!!!!!!!!!!!! There's more whinging on this thread than the entire series of LWR, RTD or LWD.

Personally I was disappointed with the first episode and yes, at the end of the series, Charley was the apparent cause of Claudio's accident. We all make mistakes. I'm not sure about Eve joining them. My riding partner is my husband so I can understand Ewan and Eve wanting to be together, but at the same time, Charley must have been gutted. It added a different dimension to the episode.

The series for me wasn't just about how they got from A to B or how they did it, it was also about the work they do with the charities and seeing the countries they visited along the way. They are famous, they are showman and they are utilising their status to bring awareness to the rest of the world the plight of some of these nations. Who knew Rwanda had a tourist industry - I didn't.

You may not like Charley and Ewan, for whatever reason, and sadly perhaps much of that is based upon how they come across thanks to the media and not because they are known on a personal level. Have some humanity and please, before your next criticism of them, or your insults at the people who don't agree with your views, can you put your hand on your heart and say that you have raised over £500k (and still rising) for charity for 3 months work? I would think that UNICEF, as well as the Children’s Hospice Association of Scotland and Riders For Health are pretty appreciative of what they've done both in terms of money raised and the heightened awareness to their causes. Who cares how they did it - they did it.

Charity is a highly questionable activity which many people disagree with. It should not be assumed that charity is a "good thing". There are powerful arguments which show that it does NOT help people. One unpleasant aspect is the practice of seeking money so that someone can go off on a jaunt of their choosing. Charity is a lottery, playing with people's lives. But there are many more unwelcome characteristics too numerous to go into.

MotoEdde 12 Dec 2007 15:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 163199)
Charity is a highly questionable activity which many people disagree with. It should not be assumed that charity is a "good thing". There are powerful arguments which show that it does NOT help people. One unpleasant aspect is the practice of seeking money so that someone can go off on a jaunt of their choosing. Charity is a lottery, playing with people's lives. But there are many more unwelcome characteristics too numerous to go into.

I agree...charity of the organized type has its fans and its detractors.

Riding through some of these underdeveloped countries and spending our own $$s there by supporting the local restaurant, food store, tire shop, etc. is just as noteworthy of 'charity' as giving to to an organization that has the tax status of charity...

What I did appreciate Charley and Ewan doing is using their recognition to highlight:

1. The ups and downs of 'adventure motorcycling'
2. The friendliness/generousity of the locals to complete strangers.
3. The existence of tourism possibilities in some of these countries
4. The possibility that its worth making the effort to scratch the itch of travel/wanderlust...!!!! You'll only regret it if you don't try!

Yes, they may do things differently than we do...HELL we all do things differently than others...BUT the common thread that brings us together here is that we enjoy what they did in LWD....
Its a stunning trip and I'd like to do part of that next time around!!!

travelHK 12 Dec 2007 19:11

long way down
 
Thanks for the post .
It 's good to see constructive comments , bashing is funny for few minutes but after a while it start to look like we cannot appreciate people if they do something different that what we think is right.Its a great trip and you can do it solo on a Royal Enfield or with a team in Range Rover for me it is the same , some have more money and choose different style of adventure but at the end they do the trip enjoy the people and have fun.I could tell story about solo rider traveling arround the world abusing hospitalilty and even stealing other fellow traveller but this is another thread.

Good job for the previous post

Caminando 13 Dec 2007 11:56

I hope people agree with me when I say that this thread and others like it, are all about discussion. It matters little if we agree, it matters a lot that we discuss.

I hope I'm not alone in thinking that the debate is important, not the conclusion.

It's a bit like Ted Simon's "The interruptions are the journey"; here it's the dialogue which intrigues me, not an end result.

I have enjoyed the differing points of view.

CornishDaddy 13 Dec 2007 14:37

Semantics
 
Hey Caminando - although only semantics, I do wonder whether when you mention charity you actually mean a financial donation? To me there is a big difference especially given your conclusion.

Cheers

Caminando 14 Dec 2007 09:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by CornishDeity (Post 163369)
Hey Caminando - although only semantics, I do wonder whether when you mention charity you actually mean a financial donation? To me there is a big difference especially given your conclusion.

Cheers

A big difference between what and what?

Caminando 14 Dec 2007 09:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by MotoEdde (Post 163200)
I agree...charity of the organized type has its fans and its detractors.

Riding through some of these underdeveloped countries and spending our own $$s there by supporting the local restaurant, food store, tire shop, etc. is just as noteworthy of 'charity' as giving to to an organization that has the tax status of charity...

What I did appreciate Charley and Ewan doing is using their recognition to highlight:

1. The ups and downs of 'adventure motorcycling'
2. The friendliness/generousity of the locals to complete strangers.
3. The existence of tourism possibilities in some of these countries
4. The possibility that its worth making the effort to scratch the itch of travel/wanderlust...!!!! You'll only regret it if you don't try!

Yes, they may do things differently than we do...HELL we all do things differently than others...BUT the common thread that brings us together here is that we enjoy what they did in LWD....
Its a stunning trip and I'd like to do part of that next time around!!!


Hey Eddie - your trip = nice trip!!!!!!!

CornishDaddy 14 Dec 2007 09:48

Difference between
 
Giving money to charity or 'charitable acts'. For instance, in my view, going to read to a lonely blind person (for example) is charity as much (or more?) than giving a pound in the street to a chugger.

Your quote:

" It should not be assumed that charity is a "good thing". There are powerful arguments which show that it does NOT help people."

Would have me think you would be adverse to this example. So, I was just clearing up whether you thought of this as charity or you were merely talking about financial donations.

palace15 14 Dec 2007 10:03

Thread done to death?
 
:offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic:

CornishDaddy 14 Dec 2007 10:11

Fair Reply
 
Oops I think thats a fair enough post!

Sorry for getting drawn in at the death and stretching it out:eek3:

Caminando 14 Dec 2007 13:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by CornishDeity (Post 163515)
Giving money to charity or 'charitable acts'. For instance, in my view, going to read to a lonely blind person (for example) is charity as much (or more?) than giving a pound in the street to a chugger.

Your quote:

" It should not be assumed that charity is a "good thing". There are powerful arguments which show that it does NOT help people."

Would have me think you would be adverse to this example. So, I was just clearing up whether you thought of this as charity or you were merely talking about financial donations.

Which example? Sorry, youre not clear in what you say.....

Dazzerrtw 15 Dec 2007 17:30

Have I missed something :(
What's LWR and LWD :confused1:

Walkabout 15 Dec 2007 17:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazzerrtw (Post 163712)
Have I missed something :(
What's LWR and LWD :confused1:

Something to do with the original thread; can't quite remember!

*Touring Ted* 24 Dec 2007 18:57

I heard that Ewans panniers were full of inflatable fake luggage and the only weight in them were the pre-signed photograhs of himself and Script of Starwars so he could keep quoting his old lines for the whole series..

Charlies bags were genuinely heavy so he could wheelie his bike in every episode.

:innocent:

Martynbiker 24 Dec 2007 22:29

I think dave Ede said it best!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tedmagnum (Post 164891)
I heard that Ewans panniers were full of inflatable fake luggage and the only weight in them were the pre-signed photograhs of himself and Script of Starwars so he could keep quoting his old lines for the whole series..

Charlies bags were genuinely heavy so he could wheelie his bike in every episode.

:innocent:

dave ede Thread done to death?
:offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic:AND I AGREE! c'mon GUYS lets bitch about someone else!

Dodger 24 Dec 2007 23:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martynbiker (Post 164919)
dave ede Thread done to death?
:offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic::offtopic: :offtopic:AND I AGREE! c'mon GUYS lets bitch about someone else!

How can it be dead when people still contribute ?
[ AND READ ] .

Merry Christmas .

MartijnP 25 Dec 2007 00:02

sad
 
After having read this enormously interesting thread I just couldn't leave without saying how sad I feel for juddadredd. It must be really difficult to be so angry all the time. He is lucky to have his parents waiting for him at home (check his site). Must be nice for him to be there around Christmas and not somewhere else.

Get the anger out of the system and live a little, please.

palace15 25 Dec 2007 00:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartijnP (Post 164933)
After having read this enormously interesting thread I just couldn't leave without saying how sad I feel for juddadredd. It must be really difficult to be so angry all the time. He is lucky to have his parents waiting for him at home (check his site). Must be nice for him to be there around Christmas and not somewhere else.

Get the anger out of the system and live a little, please.

:rofl::mchappy::rofl::mchappy::rofl::mchappy:

Same could be said about many!

Alexlebrit 25 Dec 2007 11:30

OOOO !!! Santa's brought me the DVD and book, see you all in a week.

mustaphapint 25 Dec 2007 12:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexlebrit (Post 164959)
OOOO !!! Santa's brought me the DVD and book, see you all in a week.

Me Too, I've even got 2 copies of the book!

palace15 25 Dec 2007 12:52

I have got the book and dvd..........Brought them myself why lie? :helpsmilie:

Dessertstrom 25 Dec 2007 14:37

Where's my DVD ?
 
Nope, the ba****d didn't bring me one and I wrote him such a nice letter. I bet his camel ate it.
No I am not sad coming on here on christmas day, they don't celebrate christmas here so MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU ALL

Jingly bells jindle balls jinlebelsh jinblesh ginblybuls

cheers
Ian:thumbup1:

Martynbiker 25 Dec 2007 16:27

Dave, thats Sad Dude!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave ede (Post 164968)
I have got the book and dvd..........Brought them myself why lie? :helpsmilie:

Wasnt you a good little Boy for Santa then?:rofl:

WHY buy it and make Mr Boorman even richer? I just downloaded it from the Internet

PIRACY RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

Flyingdoctor 25 Dec 2007 17:00

I got a copy of the book too. I also got a copy of "The road to Gobblers knob" by Geoff Hill. I'll read them both but I know which one I'm reading first ! Triumph Tiger on the Pan-American... ooh suits you sir.

Martynbiker 25 Dec 2007 17:17

the road to where????
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyingdoctor (Post 164988)
I got a copy of the book too. I also got a copy of "The road to Gobblers knob" by Geoff Hill. I'll read them both but I know which one I'm reading first ! Triumph Tiger on the Pan-American... ooh suits you sir.


The road to where?????
Is that top shelf stuff then? :rofl:

craig76 25 Dec 2007 22:25

Santa brought me LWD too.

I wish they would at least acknowledge those whose books, dvd's, etc, they used as reference. Not really an adventure if you're working to such a tight and rigid schedule. At least they make better entertainment than that bloke who does "Riding Eastern Europe" for the Travel Channel. Can't say you wouldn't love it as a job though.

The main thing that stood out for me while watching LWR was that if anything major had gone wrong, they had the money and means to have bailed out of it at any time, called in a helicopter and be airlifted to safety. Respect to those who have done it themselves, on their own bikes, with their own money, no back up crew and have pretty much no choice except carry on or turn back if it goes tits up.

Did make me laugh when the Snap-On gear arrived, with a tool chest "especially made for Charley Boorman". Watching him fit the pannier brackets at the BMW dealer, it was quite clear the guy didn't know one end of a spanner from his own arsehole.


A comment on Charley from The Times,
...is questioned by four policemen at Gatwick after telling an air stewardess that he has a bomb;".
12 of my mates were stripped searched at Newcastle Airport for one of them saying exactly the same thing. Now that would have made funny TV. :rofl:

Dodger 26 Dec 2007 05:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martynbiker (Post 164989)

The road to where?????
Is that top shelf stuff then? :rofl:

It's the road to ;
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...er/gobbler.jpg
Dalton Highway .

Named after a famous event that happened ;
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...der/turkey.jpg

Alexlebrit 26 Dec 2007 11:45

I also got "The Linger Longer" by Simon & Chris Raven, which is UK to Vladivostok by £300 Ford Sierra. Not bad, but the typos, spelling mistakes, bad grammar and general weirdness ("window screen" not "windscreen", anyone?) is driving my barmy, do people not use proof-readers anymore (checks to see his spelling and grammar is ok).

But that's nothing to do with E & C is it?

Martynbiker 26 Dec 2007 12:51

Excellent!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodger (Post 165036)

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Dodgy, you have sum STRANGE pics on your HD dude!

kevinrbeech 26 Dec 2007 18:35

Fashion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 157285)
One thing which I find unbelievable is that a lot of people are prepared to buy a motorbike just because an actor rode one. I refer to the leap in sales for BMW. Fine bikes as they are, what a useless reason to buy one.

I mean how f****ing vacant can some one get? There must be loads of folk without a gram of individuality who just behave like sheep.

Of course there is no such thing as individuality

Have you not heard of fashion:
In clothing designers design, fashion houses copy and everyone buys the product.

Holidays: A few Brits go to Spain for a holiday, 30 years later we have communities out there complete with Fish and Chip shops.

The list is endless, wake up and take a look around you sometime.

For what it's worth I enjoy watching it, the Long Way Down too.

Yes, I do ride, a CB 500, but when I go to Tunisia with my family I take a Discovery, been 3 times now but for me it is an adventure every time.
We'll camp at Ksar Ghilane, 1 ground tent, for the kids, one roof tent, me and the wife. We cook on a coleman duel fuel, sit in camping chairs and fetch our own water, pretty basic stuff.
Then, along comes this damn great 4x4 "lorry" (truck), fully kitted out, shower, double bed, hot water, cold water, toilet, etc etc.
So, who's having the adventure, who is doing it the correct way?

We meet convoy's of 3 or 4 vehicles, they're armed with GPS and they're off to El Borma via the dunes. They've not done the route before, there are 4 vehicles and they're pretty well self-sufficient, no TV quality cameras though. Are they any different, is the adventure not there? Ewan and Charlie have support but then so does a convoy of four independant travellers.

Is it not the case that most of the first explorers recorded their expeditions using the equipment of the day, has it stopped others doing the same trip with more modern equipment.

It's just what we do, we are all different, but then are we?

Rebaseonu 27 Dec 2007 01:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinrbeech (Post 165145)
Ewan and Charlie have support but then so does a convoy of four independant travellers.

The difference is how you present the trip. If you present it as group effort then there is nothing wrong. If you present it as "Two guys, two motorbikes", then there is difference.

guest124 27 Dec 2007 03:27

This thread started 8 weeks ago and at that time I’d read some of the new book Long Way Down. I’d read the Long Way Round and watched it on our copy of the DVD series when it was released a while back. On 31st October I said,
Quote:

Originally Posted by John-DownUnder (Post 156739)
Their travels are great publicity for motorcycling generally. This contributes to making what we enjoy doing (riding our bikes) a little less threatening; a little more acceptable to others.

I think its great to have 2 known personalities who are likable types publicizing adventure travel. It provides a little balance to the news stories on outlaw gangs being busted for smuggling guns or dealing drugs; especially when our politicians always end up grandstanding on the 1%er problems.

Without the media circus and support, the average (non-motorcycling) Joe Public and his impressionable children, would not be exposed to this type of riding/travel and so it helps differentiate it from the bad elements.

We also shouldn't forget the charitable contribution they apparently are making through this.

Well I’ve been reading the comments here and now watched the Long Way Down series on DVD (Christmas pressie). I stand by my earlier comments. The series made my wife and I want to jump back on the bike and ride off again (we just completed 5 months around western Europe). Best we can probably do though is to plan 3 or 4 months around USA and Canada in 2009. Now maybe our sort of bike travel isn’t as adventurous as undertaken by many on the HUBB (westernised versus undeveloped/developing countries), but isn’t it the sprit of the thing?

There is a strong sense from some on here that they seem to need to defend their thing as something more adventurous and “out there” than what “other” people do. I understand this but don’t really think its necessary. I used to jump out of aeroplanes (over a 1,000 jumps, an instructor, and competed at National level in the sport). If ever I was “defending” my chosen pastime against comments by whuffos (non-jumpers), it was usually done a bit tongue-in-cheek. However there was never a need to put down those already engaged in the sport. The common bond was strong.

It reminds me of the meeting Ewan and Charlie had (on the first trip) with Ted Simon (author of Jupiter’s Travels), where Ted said:
Quote:

I think that the motorcycle is best [for travelling] because it puts you so much in contact with everything. You experience much more closely the nature of the terrain. You can almost taste the cultures that you are riding through; because it exposes you to the climate, the wind and rain - so much more complete experience.
This is the common bond. Ahto, there is a lot more footage of the rest of the Long Way Down crew in this second series and I see no trying to hide the fact that they have a lot of support. In fact at the beginning of every segment, they repeat the details of the back up resources. I think though the unsung hero is Claudio. He’s there for it all, filming the lot, and with little exposure.
Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinrbeech (Post 165145)
Of course there is no such thing as individuality

Have you not heard of fashion:
In clothing designers design, fashion houses copy and everyone buys the product.

Holidays: A few Brits go to Spain for a holiday, 30 years later we have communities out there complete with Fish and Chip shops.

The list is endless, wake up and take a look around you sometime.

You’ve struck a chord Kevin - its called “airheadism”. If you haven’t already, read Shelly Gare’s book, “The Triumph of the Airheads (and the Retreat from Commonsense.)” It covers it beautifully – I recommend it.
Cheers

kevinrbeech 27 Dec 2007 09:55

Hear, hear!

John, I think you said everything that I was trying to, in an educated way.

Cheers,
Kevin

Caminando 27 Dec 2007 11:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinrbeech (Post 165145)
Of course there is no such thing as individuality

No individuality? Come to any Horizons meet and you'll see individuality! By the shedload!

kevinrbeech 27 Dec 2007 12:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 165245)
No individuality? Come to any Horizons meet and you'll see individuality! By the shedload!

But you were talking about the average person, the followers.

Surely, "Hubbers" are individuals they are the leaders, but you appeared to be talking about the masses, the people that aspire to do, but maybe they never actually make it.

Everyone to their own, we're all individuals, some are better at showing it than others.

Live your own life Caminando, and let others live their's.

Love,
K

mattcbf600 27 Dec 2007 17:37

so the thing is about LWD....

um I forgot what I was going to say.

m

(the website was very very good though)

Caminando 27 Dec 2007 17:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinrbeech (Post 165254)
But you were talking about the average person, the followers.

Surely, "Hubbers" are individuals they are the leaders, but you appeared to be talking about the masses, the people that aspire to do, but maybe they never actually make it.

Everyone to their own, we're all individuals, some are better at showing it than others.

Live your own life Caminando, and let others live their's.

Love,
K

Sorry K, I think you're a little bit confused here. But please dont explain! Happy New Year! (tho' you may have started early!)

craig76 27 Dec 2007 18:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinrbeech (Post 165145)
So, who's having the adventure, who is doing it the correct way?

So where would something like this fit in?

http://www.cannonballbikerun.com/

A "real" adventure or a jaunt for the boys?

*Touring Ted* 27 Dec 2007 18:57

I dont think anyone here genuinely dislikes Ewan or Charlie, nor do they have sleepless nights in pain or agony over what they are doing. I know I dont anyway.

I think we all like poking fun at them just like anyone with a bit of "real" overlanding experience likes to have a little laugh at the noobies or the Sunday GSers. They clearly love riding and overlanding its not important how "real" they keep it.

As for my comments, Its all meant tongue in cheek and in good humour. I´ve been on the recieving end of jokes and tutting when I started out (and still am). Its all part of the game.

There are no rules !! I dont understand the Elitism of some people.

If they showed up at a Horizons Unlimited meeting , would any of you guys shrug them off or not give them a warm welcome ?? (thats if you could see them past the UKGSers getting their DVD´s signed) :tongue3:

mattcbf600 27 Dec 2007 19:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedmagnum (Post 165313)
(thats if you could see them past the UKGSers getting their DVD´s signed) :tongue3:

Don't poke fun! I was in that cue and I don't even own a GS! (okay I once rode one and promptly fell off)

Charlie is a genuine guy when you meet him, I don't know him at all and only get that from the very brief 'hello' when I asked him to sign the Dakar book at last years bike show.

It's sometimes really hard to weigh all these things up... Long Way Round ignited a bit of a travel bug in me, which lead me to Ted Simon and then I discovered Mondo Enduro - yes it's easy to be snobby about those people who have 'done it for real' - but it essentially boils down to what we think this lark is all about - something we explored in depth in the What is Adventure Biking? thread.

For me it's the Harry Potter argument. HP is considered in the lit' world to be rather beneath 'real' lit' works - but the fact is is appealed to a very large, broad audience and it got kids reading. I see LWD and LWR in the same light.

*Touring Ted* 27 Dec 2007 20:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattcbf600 (Post 165327)

For me it's the Harry Potter argument. HP is considered in the lit' world to be rather beneath 'real' lit' works - but the fact is is appealed to a very large, broad audience and it got kids reading. I see LWD and LWR in the same light.

Actually, that a very good comparison and it makes a lot of sense !!

:thumbup1:

Martynbiker 27 Dec 2007 20:36

there are pros n cons.....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tedmagnum (Post 165313)
I dont think anyone here genuinely dislikes Ewan or Charlie, nor do they have sleepless nights in pain or agony over what they are doing. I know I dont anyway.

I think we all like poking fun at them just like anyone with a bit of "real" overlanding experience likes to have a little laugh at the noobies or the Sunday GSers. They clearly love riding and overlanding its not important how "real" they keep it.

As for my comments, Its all meant tongue in cheek and in good humour. I´ve been on the recieving end of jokes and tutting when I started out (and still am). Its all part of the game.

There are no rules !! I dont understand the Elitism of some people.

If they showed up at a Horizons Unlimited meeting , would any of you guys shrug them off or not give them a warm welcome ?? (thats if you could see them past the UKGSers getting their DVD´s signed) :tongue3:

We all have had great fun ripping them apart, me included, and I will admit to being glued to the programmes........ The thing IMHO that "grated" with most of us was the " 2 Blokes, 2 Bikes" Bullshit!
sure they needed some backup if they were gonna do a film of it, that is a reasonable and allowable necessity.

The people I feel sorry for are the guys that have bought BMWs on the Back of that programme and found out that they ARE just as hard to handle off road as Ewan and Charley made em look! Big heavy Elephantine things that they are....... I Love my XT I do!


Martyn

Caminando 27 Dec 2007 20:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by craig76 (Post 165311)
So where would something like this fit in?

http://www.cannonballbikerun.com/

A "real" adventure or a jaunt for the boys?

Sorry, Craig, this site only sells stuff. Doesnt tell you about the event, as far as I could tell.

mattcbf600 27 Dec 2007 23:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedmagnum (Post 165337)
Actually, that a very good comparison and it makes a lot of sense !!

:thumbup1:

Well... there is a first time for everything.... me making sense for example!

trophymick 28 Dec 2007 09:56

I have had to adjust my feeling towards E+C, due to receiving the book and DVD for Christmas:helpsmilie: I started to watch the first part of the journey (disc 1) yesterday, with a glass of whisky, and fell asleep nicely:thumbup1: So it ticks most of the boxes for me :rofl:.
I do feel for Claudio (sp?) who has been pushed further into the background this time, although he was doing the same (but more) as E+C:nono:


Trophymick

Bill Holland 28 Dec 2007 10:58

None of us who use this site travel unsupported, as we get answers to most bike-travel related questions from the hundreds who take the time to share their knowledge and experience.


Just a thought.

craig.iedema 28 Dec 2007 12:49

I enjoyed it heaps
 
I really don't understand why people have a problem with this show (apart from being on the wrong colour bikes i.e. not orange). I enjoyed and when they set I could feel the excitment build.

So what if they had a support crew etc etc as others have said they were making a TV show.

As for being sheep in terms of the product placements, those Arai helmets look okay, it is a PIA riding in traffic with googles no peripheral vision.

Martynbiker 31 Dec 2007 12:46

could be?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 165711)
I wonder why (seemingly) no-one who has travelled Africa has seen fit to comment here?

Perhaps they are still stuck in the Fesh-fesh?

AliBaba 31 Dec 2007 12:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 165711)
I wonder why (seemingly) no-one who has travelled Africa has seen fit to comment here?

Curiouser and curiouser.

Okay…
I’m not an expert on the African continent but I have visited it a few times and I have driven approximately 70kkm in 20-25 countries. There is still a lot left to experience and my next trip will hopefully start within a month.

First of all I haven’t seen LWD but I guess the same goes for a few people that have replied here… I will probably watch it, as I did with LWR.
I look forward to see it; as I always look forward to see movies from Africa.

I don’t care if they travel fast or with a crew or about the (loss of?) humor, but I do care a bit about what it tells about Africa and the people who lives there. After all it’s a kind of semi-documentary film.
The fact that they have huge sponsorships and other motives then other overlanders doesn’t bother me. Neither does it bother me that it gives a false impression of what it’s all about.
After all it is a movie, it’s made to sell as many copies as possible and it’s not meant to be the “thruth of overlanding”

What I care most about is how they threat the locals. I guess most of the locals find this circus amusing enough but when you travel you are also more or less an ambassador for the first world and I’m not sure if this guys are up top the task.
I think this subject should be discussed more on the HUB. Subjects like gifts, bribing and so on.

Well, maybe I should see the film….

palace15 31 Dec 2007 13:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caminando (Post 165711)
I noticed that on this thread, no-one commented who'd "done" Africa- tho' I could be wrong. So I enjoyed reading in MotorCycle News from one guy who rode Africa on an Africa Twin and he thought the LWD trip was great, full of difficulties which they had to face etc etc.

So that's an opinion I value, ' cos the guy did the trip/continent.

I wonder why (seemingly) no-one who has travelled Africa has seen fit to comment here?

Curiouser and curiouser.

Probably the riders that have done serious African trips have not 'risen to the bait'

3 familiar names back in close proximity! :rofl::clap:

Martynbiker 31 Dec 2007 14:23

roflmao
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dave ede (Post 165720)
3 familiar names back in close proximity! :rofl::clap:

Like yer new bike Cammy!

http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/e...IKE/biker1.jpg


:thumbup1:

John Ferris 31 Dec 2007 14:36

It just doesn't smell right.
YouTube - Ewan - Davidoff Adventure

Walkabout 31 Dec 2007 15:04

No idea what it smells like, but it is funny!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Ferris (Post 165740)
It just doesn't smell right.
YouTube - Ewan - Davidoff Adventure

Now that is funny and a well made programme!
Spot the Bonnie.

stuxtttr 31 Dec 2007 17:20

The things we love to hate
 
Another Christmas over and the DVD watched. What can I say I know have mixed feelings of it all. Yes it did make me want to get back on the bike and travel but it also pissed me off. The bit with the fire is just silly and Claudio is the true star as he has to lead the way to get filming oppurtunities. There was not so much adventure as LWR and its all got a little too proffesional for my liking maybe the Mondo Boys and Louise can do us proud and do another great trip that appeals to us all. I can see what everyone was getting at now as the book tells the story in a different way. Now i must go and set the sky box to record the Dakar. I love January Happy New Year Everyone.

Explorador 15 Jan 2008 22:03

Finally catching it here in US
 
After checking in on this thread forever and wondering what I was missing, I've finally found Long Way Round. Have TIVO'd it on Direct TV and seen the first episode. Will get channel info if anyone in US is interested (or maybe it's been here for a while and I'm late...)

Martynbiker 15 Jan 2008 22:10

what are you recording instead ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stuxtttr (Post 165769)
Now i must go and set the sky box to record the Dakar.

So now its been Cancelled,:( what are you recording instead?:confused1:

Martyn

pockey 15 Jan 2008 23:06

london to cape town
 
I agree its a bit plasticeeeee with all the back up but it do some good in my case as the wife got some understanding of what i am planning for and to a extent what i will experience, and is actually helping me with the project instead of thinking that i am crazy, and did not understand why i am putting in so much effort in the bike and planning.

Birdy 22 Jan 2008 14:24

Just watched it.
 
As a very late comer to the topic, and a serial thread killer, I should probably not contribute, but I am oh so bad at making the right choices.

I didn't enjoy it, not out of any deap seated jealousy (honest) or moral misgivings, just because it is very badly made.

The camerawork was generally horrible, the voiceovers grating, the focal points badly chosen, and the 'talent' incredibly annoying. Ewan was likable enough to justify his 'celebrity,' but HOW innane and whingey is his spoilt child of a boyfriend!? Immature and simple, and the 'energetic and mischevous rogue' persona he tries so hard to project just ends up as retarded child for me.

The two 'suits' travelling in the support cars were by far the biggest flaw of the experience though. Their attitude turned it from the purported adventure of a lifetime into an over structured expedition. One of their comments at the end was something along the lines of.

'I'm glad it's over, but I'm also a little bit sad,'

This says everything about their motivation, it was just a job for them. If I was E or C, I would never have employed that sort of man for such a trip. Conversely, Claudio seemed to have a great attitude, very easy going and adventure spirited - but got much less screentime than he did in LWR?

It is a format of television that depends heavily on the personalities of those involved, which is why Michael Palin has done so well in this arena. I just can't empathise with any of the characters (which is essentially what they are, as several people have stated - this may as well be a soap opera.) To an extent, Ewan can carry the others with his charisma and superior celeb status, but this is not enough. Who would want to carry Char;ie very far, or either of the overstuffed suits for that matter.:rolleyes2:

At the end of the day it was successful, so what do I know?

We all know that a lot of that success comes from Tarquins with limited edition LWD Snap On Toolboxes parked beside their Landrover though.:mchappy:

Happy Riding.

Joel

Alexlebrit 22 Jan 2008 15:24

I know someone called Tarquin, and he has neither a Snap-On toolbox nor a Landie...

But yes, I'd agree, the "producers" got a lot more air-time and I didn't really feel the need to see them. Perhaps they could have done a companion programme, like that Comedy & Soap on ITV at the moment with Ben Miller and Jason Donovan, that way you could have watched one or other or both.

smitty 22 Jan 2008 19:24

"And you can take dat to da Bank!!!"
 
Don't you just know that Ewan and Charlie read this website "Tongue in Cheek" and roar with laughter (all the way to the Bank). I can picture the two of them sitting at a bar, one slapping his knee in glee as he recaps this thread while the other (attempting to swallow his beer), blows it out on the bar. They still have other scenario possibilities (The Pole to Pole way around, The 45 degree angle way around, etc.). Ewan, Charlie, let me know what you guys have "up your sleaves" next. I'm packed and ready. Smitty

Walkabout 22 Jan 2008 21:53

Let's hope so
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdy (Post 170146)
As a serial thread killer,
Joel

If you can achieve that trick in this case Joel, you will do us all a favour IMO.

Thanks in anticipation,

Martynbiker 22 Jan 2008 22:03

NO! Behave.......
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkabout (Post 170238)
If you can achieve that trick in this case Joel, you will do us all a favour IMO.

Thanks in anticipation,

Walkabout, with 264 Posts and Currently 8770 Views, Caminando has Inadvertently created one of the most Popular threads on the Forum!

I say 3 cheers for Cammy! :thumbup1:

Martyn

palace15 22 Jan 2008 22:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martynbiker (Post 170241)
Walkabout, with 264 Posts and Currently 8770 Views, Caminando has Inadvertently created one of the most Popular threads on the Forum!

I say 3 cheers for Cammy! :thumbup1:

Martyn


WE LOVE CAMMY !!

:eek3::eek3::eek3:

Does he love us, Martyn??


:icon16::icon16::icon16:

XT GIRL 30 Jan 2008 06:59

The BLONDE way DOWN...
 
Its not that we set out to prove Ewan and Charley are girls with big knickers....

On the CONTRARY - this is an OPEN invitation to the luvvies (and their cute camera guy... Claudine or something?) to join us on the REAL way down to Cape Town from London.

We're two (soft, London) GIRLS on very, very old XTs, which we are preparing OURSELVES, so it shouldn't be tooo hard for them to keep up!

They won't EVEN need ANY of their very expensive (freebie) gear - which is a SHAME maybe, cos that LUSCIOUS red SNAP-ON toolbox is just sooo BIJOUX!

We're kitting OURSELVES out and just about EVERYTHING has been pre-owned or bought from ebay! (God bless ebay!)

(Not our very tiny, lacy black underwear ofcourse...they're STRAIGHT from Anne Summers! A girl HAS to be prepared in case you have an accident and the paramedics have to take your clothes off! Ewan knows ALL about the importance of looking good - that PIMPLE he sported during LWR was soooo EMBARASSING!!)

And ALSO - they DONT have to worry with all those trucks and Chelsea Tractors that are forever following them everywhere - cos we're managing to pack absolutely EVERYTHING WE NEED, including LIPSTICK and MOISTURISER (Body Butter- its gorgeous!), on our bikes!!

Nooo kidding!! We were JUST as surprised about that! Fancy that... we SERIOUSLY thought that we might have to hire a few extra crates like the two boyzzz did - but we managed JUST FINE!


Which is LUCKY - because that gives us loads of space for THEIR fluffy bums, to fit on our PILLION SEATS.

(For when their fancy new machinces break down (or they CRASH into each other) and the RAC can't scramble a private jet with a mechanic to fix it for them. Sigh! Celebrity Platinum Diamond membership can be soooo unreliable sometimes).

As a SPECIAL bonus - because we're ALREADY paying for the whole trip by ourselves (working 9-5 in an office), we will buy them food etc. on the way.
God knows, they obviously need as much help as they can get, what with never having to pay for anything themselves. Poor things, its the LEAST we can do and it will only take a few extra weekends of working overtime.

We'd EVEN allow Charley to pop a few of his daft wheelies - he's sooo silly! We learnt how to do that when we were 16 - so its a bit old by now - but its COMPLETELY understandable that he's got to get rid SOME of that frustration that comes with being in someone's SHADOW all the time. And what with him not finishing the Dakar... Bless him!

We'd HAVE to prepare them a little bit for the trip though. None of that HARD-CORE, MOVIE STUNT MAN anti-terrorism NINJA TURTLE warfare stuff that they got last time! (HONESTLY! We've both LIVED in Africa and NEVER even got in a fistfight! They are soooooo OVER REACTING!)

Nope - They would have to learn, to face Africa's harsh and breathtaking beauty, with only THEMSELVES to rely on!!!!!

And the ABJECT horror of actually INTERACTING on a NON-CELEBRITY level with LOCAL, ORDINARY, AFRICAN people??!

That will scare the LIVING BEJEEZUS out of them...


Oh - heck! ONLY KIDDING boyyyyzzz!

Don't get scared!

WE will be there to help you out if you get stuck!

We're just ORDINARY girls, with NOT a lot of money - but we're PRETTY SURE you will have LOTS of fun with us!

HOWBOUDIT?


__________________________________________________ ________
Disclaimer: The above was written in response to everyone else's heated response to the LWR/LWD franchise - which in itself is VASTLY more entertaining than the actual book/dvd. (Not had time or inclination to watch/read all of it).

Its meant to be a p**ss take and does NOT constitute my opinion on the project: Different strokes, for different oakes, as the South Africans say.

In fact - I'm far more interested in watching JOHNY DEPP ... have you seen SWEENY TODD?!

juddadredd 30 Jan 2008 08:17

LMAO see now that's how it should be done, which is pretty much whatI've said from day one.

Now here come the armchair mob with oh Ewan and Charlie are the bikers friends.

mattcbf600 30 Jan 2008 08:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by juddadredd (Post 171635)
LMAO see now that's how it should be done, which is pretty much whatI've said from day one.

Now here come the armchair mob with oh Ewan and Charlie are the bikers friends.

They inspired me (not an armchair biker). Can't you just enjoy it for what it is? A piece of entertainment? The Harry Potter of the biking world? Not strictly the hardcore pure version of it's art, but inspiring and gets more people into this silly thing we call adventure biking.

Or of course, we could all just be snobs and point at others saying 'poo! they just don't do it properly!'

Grr I wasn't going to reply.

m

XT GIRL 30 Jan 2008 09:17

Here's the thing...
 
I'm wondering....

Dont you think that seeing celebs doing the adventure thing - actually makes it LESS accessible to joe public?

We're all bikers, so we can see it what for what it is... but a LAYMAN would see the whole thing and may think:

1. You need LLLOOOOAAADS of money to do adventure travel

2. You need a HUGE entourage to SUPPORT you and KEEP YOU SAFE

3. You need to be FIT to do it, and have had SAS training etc. etc. etc. not the mention the expensive equipment etc. etc. etc.


And they did'nt really go out of their way to make it look EASY or POSSIBLE for ordinary folk to achieve??


ALL in all - celebrities doing something, usually has the effect of making it COMPLETELY INACCESSIBLE to mortal men... because joe public knows that they have a multimillion organisation behind them...

ESPECIALLY since it now creates the impression that you wont make it unless you are on a VERY EXPENSIVE new BMW etc. etc.

I had that feeling when I saw that British girl with her big B&Q boat (can't remember her name.. now a Dame or something) circumnavigate the globe....First woman to do it solo or something...

My very FIRST thought was: okay for SOME -- middle class upbringing, sponsored to the hilt... obviously sailing is only for the UBER RICH....


ARGH!!! I've just BORED myself to sleep..... :sleep1::sleep1::sleep1::sleep1::sleep1::sleep1::s leep1:

Alexlebrit 30 Jan 2008 16:56

They won't come
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171627)
On the CONTRARY - this is an OPEN invitation to the luvvies (and their cute camera guy... Claudine or something?) to join us on the REAL way down to Cape Town from London.

We're two (soft, London) GIRLS on very, very old XTs, which we are preparing OURSELVES, so it shouldn't be tooo hard for them to keep up!

But can I come and sit on your pillion instead?

mattcbf600 30 Jan 2008 18:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171645)
I'm wondering....

Dont you think that seeing celebs doing the adventure thing - actually makes it LESS accessible to joe public?

The first serious point in this so very long thread.

I think that what they've done is slowly take AB nearer the main -stream, and that they've turned it into a bit of a show and circus, and those people who like this kind of life because it's a bit like dropping out don't like the fact it's no longer exclusive - and they behave in the same way that any select few do - they become snobbish, and they call people who like E&C armchair riders and such.

Have to tell you guys, Long Way Round is what inspired me to get off my bum in front of the telly and ride to Russia - I didn't think you needed a back up crew, but I did assume it was probably very expensive.

But then, being an intelligent chap (like most of the audience), I read a little, joined a few forums and discovered that... no.. it didn't have to cost the earth and you can pretty much do it on any bike that came along.

Would I even know who Ted Simon was if it wasn't for E&C - nope - would I be doing this without that initial inspiration I got from them... who knows perhaps something else would have sparked my interest.

I hate this thread. I hate it because it has brought out the very worst in all of us, it's brought out the snobby behaviour and un-friendly jibes that demonstrate that we're not friendly and welcoming, but actually a bit elitist... and I can't stand elitism in any form.

Alexlebrit 30 Jan 2008 19:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171757)
Er. I don't know.... are you famous or something?

Yes, of course, but only in very small circles.

Oh and I know a bloke who won Big Brother.

John Ferris 30 Jan 2008 21:56

I love this thread. The only problem is that so much of it is in English.
I need a Canadian to translate it to american english.

mattcbf600 30 Jan 2008 22:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171770)
Now, now... I THINK you're taking all of this a bit too seriously! HONESTLY - if you read the comments, MOST of them are pretty tongue in cheek... :funmeteryes:


Interestingly - most of the contributors are also British.

I've been living in Britain for ten years, and if there's one thing I've learnt of the Brits - its that they ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS take pops at THEIR OWN -- Anyone who'se raised slightly above the 'normal man' pedestal. (anything from their royalty, to their sport stars, to best-selling authors, to politicians).

Heck - their WAR HEROES get their medals IN THE POST!!


I don't think its elitist - I think, in a weird way, its healthy...stops people from taking themselves too seriously... (those who do, pay the price, or emmigrate.)


And - just to prove my point - here you are, bitterly critisizing your fellow Brits !! :clap::clap::clap:

See - good old healthy self-critism in its purest form, just like true Brit!


Charley and Ewan being Brits, I'm sure will take it with good grace. I'm sure they're already planning the next episode to make the national collective choke on their WD40 fumes!

..............................................

:eek3:

Martynbiker 30 Jan 2008 22:27

oooo fighting talk..... Ban looming! lol
 
[quote=impasto;171770



Charley and Ewan being Brits,[/quote]

Ewan MacGregor is SCOTTISH!!

he would Choke on his Haggis if he read that Mardi..:rofl:

Martyn

Martynbiker 30 Jan 2008 23:46

ah yes BUT......
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171829)
Martyn, Martyn, Martyn...

Brit·ish (brhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/ibreve.gifthttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gifhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/ibreve.gifsh)
adj. 1. a. Of or relating to Great Britain or its people, language, or culture.
b. Of or relating to the United Kingdom or the Commonwealth of Nations.

2. Of or relating to the ancient Britons.


Last time I looked, Scotland was part of Great Britain.

AND, if we reallly want to get technical, British actually originally referred to people of Celtic origin... so its more Scottish than English (who are predominantly Anlo-Saxon)

:rolleyes2::rolleyes2::rolleyes2:


And not putting tooooo fine a point on it... its McGregor.

:rolleyes2::rolleyes2::rolleyes2:

you try telling that to a Scot! they are a touchy race.... I should know my mate is one and he can be a real pedant about it.

palace15 30 Jan 2008 23:53

[quote impasto] AND, if we reallly want to get technical, British actually originally referred to people of Celtic origin

Tell that to a Glasgow Rangers fan!:eek3:

Dodger 31 Jan 2008 02:27

Well the Celts displaced the ancient Brits who fled to Wales and the westerly bits ,then came the Romans who displaced the Celts to the mid westerly bits , then after they buggered off came the Angles ,Saxons and Jutes who were then pushed westerly by the Vikings .
William the Bastard came over from Normandy built a few castles and buggered up the language and laws .
In the meantime the Picts and Sots were swapping places and leapfrogging over a Roman wall somewhere up north , molesting sheep and trying on skirts .
Then a few hundred years later when England had run out of suitable king material ,they imported one from the above bunch of leap froggers and everyone though it jolly clever to call it Britain again .
Various forays into Ireland to try to beat them into submission rape their cattle and steal their women ,and another imported king or two , plus a brief period without one ,and it was time to call it Great Britain .

So how about that for a race of misfits ?
And I are one .

Canadians officially now use British spelling , although I can translate if requested -eh .


PS
Dong way down is not on Canuck TV yet , I bet you can tell ,can't you ?

mattcbf600 31 Jan 2008 07:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodger (Post 171862)
Well the Celts displaced the ancient Brits who fled to Wales and the westerly bits........

Beautifully put :clap: I'm Welsh, but British, from the United Kingdom originally of Celtic decent but with a bit of Saxon mixed in (for fun).

phoenix 31 Jan 2008 09:24

Charlie Boorman claims to be Irish (or at least, he has done on Irish tv).. For all I know, he probably claims to be British when it suits him too :)

Martynbiker 31 Jan 2008 09:35

ive heard.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by phoenix (Post 171887)
Charlie Boorman claims to be Irish (or at least, he has done on Irish tv).. For all I know, he probably claims to be British when it suits him too :)

Heard he even claims to be an Adventure Biker too.......:rofl: when it suits, and the moneys rolling in!!

Alexlebrit 31 Jan 2008 17:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by impasto (Post 171772)
OK - just a moment, I'm just checking my celebrity A - Z list.

We can't POSSIBLY take anyone that fall below "P".

I thiiiink that BB connection might just about swing it!

This'll swing it... I was once on Radio 4 and OMG, it's still there on the Listen Again page.

skysurferboy 2 Feb 2008 14:24

Charly and Ewans money making 'Adventure'
 
Charlie and Ewan are like Marmite! You either love 'em or hate 'em.

Their expeditions are a pure money making scam just as Z factor/Pap Idol etc etc are. They are watered down and dumned down for the brain dead who will NEVER leave their comfortable life to do any exploring. Entertainment is what it is called. They are HUGELY successful (businesses) when compared with previous motorcycle films/publications and have brought an ersatz 2 wheel lifestyle to the masses.

Its totally contrived superficiality. Nothing wrong with that in the current climate!!! Nothing at all!!!!

Neither of them are any good at riding motorcycles. That hasn't stopped the faux celeb of Charlie Boorman becoming a reviewer in the national motorcycle press in the UK. I suppose that would annoy a few people. It's a bit like one of the talentless nobodys that your gran pays £1.50/min to vote for on the Z factor telling John/Paul/George and Ringo how to write pop songs. The fact is that Charly has become a de facto 'Expert' on all things 2 wheeled through being a celeb and a mate of Ewan. That's showbusiness....

The 1150/1200 have become best sellers to the cash rich who need another lifestyle accessory ala 4x4s. A mate has had 2 GSs and after 2 years finally decided he didn't like Charly/Ewan afterall and then thought he'd bought the wrong bike. Neither bike ever went of the pavement. Doh! That's advertising.........BMW 1 punters 0.

They didn't need even a third of the people (26 and not counting every local fixer they used) working for them on their 'adventure holiday'. You don't need 2 4x4s and 5 cameramen/security guard/medic////. Most TV production is single camera, presenter, producer,fixer/researcher and that's it. Bigger travel doco's might have a team of 8 people but most multi task. But you can pay for your 26 people and 4x4s when you are getting obscene amounts of money (£300k/hour) from the tax payer so why not? Most viewers won't question this........

I thought that the Long Way idea had had its day after Race to Dakar. You know the one where Charly didn't last more than 5 days but tells everyone he meets that he did the Dakar. I think that was Simon that did it Charly not you. You were a spectator. But the public keep lapping it up.......

Overall the camerawork was better (a bit of HD) and the production values higher than LWA but it was SOOOOOOO formulaic and laboured. Here's Charley and Ewan at this ruin, C+E at this one/C+E at this 5 star hotel then this one etc.
What really really annoyed me and my missus was 'expert' Charly regurgitating every little fact that a fixer/local or guide had told him minutes earlier to camera as if he had 'the knowledge'. Time and time again he would big himself up and make out he was well researched and read. He was using the LWD as his showreel to get a presenting job coz he can't act. He'll fool someother publications/production company or travel programme and we'll have his bad teeth and adolescent antics plastered across or pages or screens for the next 2 years until he's been found out. But then that's the 'MAGIC???' of televsion ain't it......

They are celebs Charly and Ewan. Nothing more. Don't be fooled that because they have thrown their legs over a tax payer sponsored GS that they'll be inviting you round to the Ivy for lunch coz they're bikers just like you. As for presenting a 'positive' image. I don't think pulling wheelies, lighting farts, whining like a girl and crashing into your fellow riders is presenting a positive image. Far from it. But some people believe it........

As for the 'charidy' work. Show me the benefits of any celeb carrying on about aid to Africa. It's the zeitgeist ....renta celeb. Every charidy does it........

Take it for what it is. A couple of luvvies playing at being real adventurers in a nice safe cottton wool wrapped enviroment with plenty of backup and money to get them out of trouble. Switch your brain off and you'll enjoy it more then.


That's why I'm suprised the thread is still active. The programmes were never aimed at those that do or those in the know. They were aimed at bored cash rich mid life crisis types who have a large disposable income but not too many brain cells. Not the kind of people the HUBB attracts. I thought you all would have chuckled at their fake plastic adventure and gone about your business. Seems they hit a raw nerve..........


All the best, S

Walkabout 2 Feb 2008 14:40

Nice post S, you got it in one!

The thread survives because it "properly" belongs in the new "bar" that has opened up recently - in other words, it is still winter in the UK and beyond, so some folk, including me, have a bit of time to spare, some days anyway; actually I am waiting for England to give some to the Welsh in the Rugby later today, but that is :offtopic:.
(Ireland 10 - Italy 0, right now).

Birdy 2 Feb 2008 15:21

Great post skysurfer, hit every nail there I think. I believe your predections are going to come around one day sometime soon, that buck toothed ham is going to inflict a lot more pain on us yet!

Same to you Walkabout, your prediction is also correct, we are going to Bash some Taffs! Woopwoop.:offtopic:

I may have had a beer or two.

Happy Riding

Joel

mattcbf600 2 Feb 2008 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by skysurferboy (Post 172318)
Charlie and Ewan are like Marmite! You either love 'em or hate 'em.


They didn't need even a third of the people (26 and not counting every local fixer they used) working for them on their 'adventure holiday'. You don't need 2 4x4s and 5 cameramen/security guard/medic////. Most TV production is single camera, presenter, producer,fixer/researcher and that's it. Bigger travel doco's might have a team of 8 people but most multi task. But you can pay for your 26 people and 4x4s when you are getting obscene amounts of money (£300k/hour) from the tax payer so why not? Most viewers won't question this........

As I said earlier in this thread... they're the Harry Potter of the biking world... to purists HP is a load of tosh... to the general public some enjoyable reading... both have something to offer to general viewers.

Skysurferboy... you seem to know an awful lot about TV production and how much the BBC paid for just the TV rights for LWD..... perhaps you could explain where you've got your information from? I'd be very interested in hearing.

m

mattcbf600 2 Feb 2008 20:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdy (Post 172331)

Same to you Walkabout, your prediction is also correct, we are going to Bash some Taffs! Woopwoop.:offtopic:

Joel

:offtopic:

Well Joel... how do you feel about the predictions now... still want to bash some taffs?

England 19 : Wales 26

:clap::clap::clap::clap: :rofl:

Walkabout 2 Feb 2008 21:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkabout (Post 172321)
actually I am waiting for England to give some to the Welsh in the Rugby later today, but that is :offtopic:.
(Ireland 10 - Italy 0, right now).

The game was there to be lost!

High time this thread went to the bar BTW.

mattcbf600 2 Feb 2008 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkabout (Post 172393)
The game was there to be lost!

High time this thread went to the bar BTW.

agreed......

mattpope 3 Feb 2008 01:49

I'm on a long work trip abroad and have too much time on my hands which is when I get involved with threads like this. They're great! Fantastic.

Managed to get through a whole load of books on this trip including Long Way Down and Ted Simon's Dreaming of Jupiter. Both are well worth the read if you like bikes and travel - I like the way Ted tells his stories - his slideshows are always good value at the HU meeting.

My feeling about Ewan and Charley is that they don't deserve the grief they seem to attract here and almost every other biking forum. There are elements that may not appeal to everyone but as far as I see it they have put together a bike travel programme that is on the TV and without them we would have nothing. My hat comes off to everyone who has done this whether it is Austin and the guys in Mondo Enduro and Terra Circa or Kevin and Julia Sanders on their Globebusters trip. All very different trips.

The point is that these guys have done the mileage on their bikes from A to B. The whole support crew issue is irrelevant - they are only in place for logistical reasons and cannot make the riding any easier or less enjoyable. If Ewan and Charlie were hopping into the support truck whenever there was too much mud or the road got a bit tough then that would be one thing. They never did, they rode the distance and fair play to anyone who has done that. (Anyone remember Ffyona Campbell?)

Sure when things go wrong - be it mechanically, an accident or on the paperwork front - then this is where the support crew becomes useful. In reality though it only speeds up any delay that any solo rider would face waiting for a spare part to be shipped over or tracking down a local mechanic or spending a few days waiting on an embassy. However that is not what the trip is about. It's about the riding and each to their own on that.

I have never done a RTW like they have. I would very much like to. My first bike trip (first time on a bike infact) was on an Enfield Bullet coming back from India to the UK. It was a very different trip but I can't ever think to slag them off because they did a trip very differently to mine. I've never done a London-Cape Town let alone a John O'Groats-Cape Town trip but I certainly would like to. It'll be different for sure and better for me - simply because it's my decision how it will be organised. I'll stop here before it becomes a rant - I've made my point.

Basically they have hit upon a good formula. They can do something they like doing for a few months which is good publicity for them and a whole number of charities. Makes a stack of cash and have a pretty good adventure.

I stand up and salute all fellow bike travellers past, present and future. Hope we get to see more films as a result on the TV. Sure as heck beats most of the crap we are supplied with.

Matt

skysurferboy 3 Feb 2008 10:43

long threads are great/Charley n Ewbie
 
long threads are great. I joined in coz I'm stuck at home nursing a crushed foot after a biking accident so have plenty of time to keep myself amused on the HUBB.

As you say Matt Charley n Ewbie have hit upon a good fomula which they are exploiting to the max with TV coverage and merchandising. Good luck to them it certainly is better than an episode of sodding Bargain Hunt or Homes under the friggin Hammer but lets not fool ourselves that it is real adventuring.

Nobody but the inner circle on each of those rides (LWA/LWD/Dakar) will know exactly what went on. They could have trailered the bikes all the way and rode a few hundred yards for the camera or had several replacement bikes flown out after problems. They might also have ridden every last inch or had someone ride the tough bits for them or had nowt in the panniers or stunt doubles or been abducted by aliens.......That's the magic of telly! How totally genuine and truthful the depiction of events was you'll never ever know and in the industry such deceptions are called 'acceptable artifice' and are widely used and justified.

On a trip like that the riding is by far the EASIEST bit! It's the bit we all love and the reason we do it. Trips are not about 'the riding' though are they? If that were the case then why not ride up and down the M1 motorway all day for 2-3 weeks? I like being on my bike as clearly Charley n Ewbie do but commutting to work is not the same as blasting the dunes in the Sahara or negotiating a mountain pass. Our biking travels are about so much more than just riding. The fact is with 'adventure' travelling of all kinds the word adventure implies some element of danger or hazard. When those elements are removed by having scores of people moving mountains to make your journey easier the 'adventure' has therefore been diluted. The famous saying "what doesn't kill us makes us stronger" applies to all of the hassles(read learning experiences) you get on a trip.

Dealing with customs, officials, planning,map reading, navigating, prep'ing bikes, finding fuel and food and shelter are ALL part of the experience and just as important as 'the riding'. As are the riding in dirty gear, not bathing, camping out , the places you visit, the route decided upon and the people you meet along the way etc. Doing such a trip 'in a bubble' as C+E seems to have done is to miss all of that. Anyone who delegates the responsibilty of the above tasks is losing out on those elements and it's only my opinion but I feel they are poorer for it. As the beatles said " money can't buy you love" it can buy the illusion of love and many other illusions too, such as the illusion you are a bona fide adventurer.

I guess the reason some people on the HUBB get so absolutely furious with these 2 is that they are so passionate about what they think is a misrepresentation of adventure travelling and motorcycle culture. I did too once, now I roll my eyes instead.

As someone earlier in the thread has pointed out I think Claudio was the unsung hero of both the LWA and LWD. Unlike the other 2 he rode the same distance, the same roads but all the while he was WORKING hard filming and directing Chaz n Ewbie. He had to put up with broken bikes and crashes aswell as being crashed into by the itinerant Mr Boorman. As always afterwards he was softly spoken and stoical. The guys behind the camera are the real heroes............

Can't wait for the next 'adventure'

KenKeller 3 Feb 2008 12:46

Pie, anyone?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Walkabout (Post 172321)
...I am waiting for England to give some to the Welsh in the Rugby later today...

How embarassing to set yourself up for a fall like that, on a public forum too! And then to come crashing down. Ha, ha! Even makes me cringe!

Walkabout 3 Feb 2008 17:17

Round 1 is over
 
Not at all Ken, the game was won by half time and lost in the second half; that's Rugby for you - it beats football hands down.
My view yesterday was based on my thoughts on form; this turned out to be wrong, but I didn't have money on it so, no worries.

Now that we have seen all of the teams, I reckon France are the likely champs for this season - we will see how they get on next weekend against, let me see now, oh yes, Ireland.


:offtopic: Now this thread must be destined to be in the bar.

mattpope 4 Feb 2008 05:51

Hi Sky Surfer,

Hope that foot is on the mend and you are back on the road again soon. Until then the thread continues. Some of what you say I agree with and some I have to disagree with - I guess that's the great thing about this. Everyone has an opinion about how they would do it but I just feel they have received a lot more grief than they merit.

It is true we don't know all the details but I would rather give them the benefit of the doubt. For all the stuff that they didn't do which was pretty routine and dull (visas, border fixing etc), I honestly believe that they did ride from UK to South Africa - surely the LWD is not such a conspiracy. Crikey! Perhaps it really wasn't even C+E! We've been duped!

I disagree when you say the riding is the easy bit - those are infamously bad roads in Sudan/Ethiopia/northern Kenya. It is not the M1. The represent a challenge that once complete is very satisfying but at the time when the bike breaks, you come off in the sand or get taken out by a crazy driver, it is an experience that unites us all. We see the same scenery and are exposed to the whatever Africa just throws up. However, I do agree that this is the fun bit even if at the time it doesn't seem that way!

The preparations, visa hunting, unscheduled delays, bike problems, illnesses etc are all part of the trip - but more peripheral aspects than the main focus. For the "average" trans Africa biker this is something that you have to go through and suffer. It's part of the experience but it's not why you do the trip. The focus is the ride itself, the locations you end up in and the chance meetings you make along the way.

I wonder whether cyclists would argue that us bikers are less adventurous than they are? It's the same trip involving where we go but the method is different. I'm not sure if this is the point that the E+C haters are making - because they had so much help it doesn't count.

LWR and LWD are not my "ultimate bike trips" but it is a start that might lead to more coverage for this type of show.

Claudio was indeed a star - you have to respect his determination on those roads when the riding was obviously difficult. In the book there is recognition by C+E that the support crew made the trip possible but during the show they didn't always come across as being totally appreciated.....

Cheers!

Matt

PS I am not Charlie's mum

Martynbiker 4 Feb 2008 09:18

she was proved to have 'misled' though....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mattpope (Post 172439)

they rode the distance and fair play to anyone who has done that.

(Anyone remember Ffyona Campbell?)


Matt

If I remember rightly, Ffyona Campbell claimed to have walked ALL the way when in fact she did not and took rides in a pick up/ car etc...... I'm not making small of her achievement, she did after all walk a hell of a long way, but she did also LIE, people could have forgiven her if she just said "look guys, i'm knackered and cant face this bit of the journey,so I'm gonna ride this one out" she did not.
Yes Charlie n Ewan may have 'ridden the distance' as you say. but 5* Hotels? Huge backup crews? 3 guys picking their Bikes up whenever they drop em? :rolleyes2:, Thats hardly Hardy Traveller routine is it?

The LWD & LWR Programme Makers make people think that to RTW you have to have a BMW1200GS with all the kit etc etc etc.. you don't NEED all that crap to Adventure your way round this Planet! BMW on the other hand are laughin all the way to the Bank!

Martyn

skysurferboy 6 Feb 2008 09:45

Chaz n Ewbies amazing adventures
 
Hi Charleys Mum (er I mean Matt),

The foot is healing nicely thanks but I'm going for some more X rays today as the pain on the top of my foot is still not gone and it's 3 weeks since the accident.

I agree with what you say. The riding can be hard and be the reason for most peoples trips. However I like a lot of things about my short trips not just the riding. Sure the visas and customs/carnets are a pain in the ass but once you've done it a few times it gets a little easier. I remember being very green and naive at the Moroccan border on my first biking trip to Africa and getting ripped by the toothless little bastard that skanks unsuspecting travellers. But what should I have expected?? I felt a right tw@t driving off into Morocco but was better prepared on the way back. Chaz n Ewbie didn't have to bother with all that though and sent one of their minnions to do it therefore learning nothing.

I agree with Martynbiker too that now everyone at home watchin the telly believes that to do any sort of trip you need a 1200GS and a support team of 4x4s. Hell a couple of mates I know went to the Nurburgring on their bikes with their wives driving the now obligatory 4x4 'support vehicle' behind them. One of the guys laughed at me when I said that people do the LWA trips on their own without a team sorting out visas and support trucks. I even sent him links to the HUBB and AMH, Dave Beers website. He said it was all bullsh1t and that it couldn't be done. These are sensible intelligent people who have watched a few LWA episodes. For as many people who decide to buy a bike and go off to Africa on their own I think a similar number will be put off thinking that it's an impossible task.

I saw a music programme on the telly (former musician myself) last week. One of the talkin heads (now famous muso) said that he'd seen Yes at a gig and thought "I can't do that. I'm not that good" he then went to see the Sex Pistols at the Free Trade Hall in Manchester and after the gig went and bought a guitar. His band ended up having the biggest selling 12inch record in history. I think C&E might just be having the wrong effect on some people........but that's just my opinion. ;-)

Birdy 6 Feb 2008 13:38

:offtopic:'Well Joel... how do you feel about the predictions now... still want to bash some taffs?
England 19 : Wales 26'

Ahem..er, the pitch was too wet, and the ref was against us, and the day of the week had a 'y' in it, and there was this one bird and it flew over the stadium at the wrong time, but it wasn't the one we were playing in, it was in Kobe, and it flapped its wings and there was a hurricane in Java so the scrum half had a sore calf and the temperature of the magic sponge was green.

Er..yeah, we won the first half though!:offtopic:



Good comparison Skysurfer, I like it. CanE are the new 'Yes.' Does that make Ted Simons Sid Vicious? Incidentally 'Cain' was the biblical progenitor of all evil who killed the only thing he really loved. Spooky? Or just an serendipitous abbreviation and an injured and overly bored biker? You decide! Incidentally, as a fellow cripple, I hope you get well soon.

'I remember being very green and naive at the Moroccan border on my first biking trip to Africa and getting ripped by the toothless little bastard that skanks unsuspecting travellers.'

As long as it wasn't just me who got skanked by a toothless bastard in Morocoo. Your point is very valid though, it is the incidentals that provide the anecdotes to bore people with for years to come, it isn't the stage managed and oh so heart felt encounters with locals. It isn't lighting your gas on TV like a retarded monkey, it isn't just another boring five star resort to stay in. If we all had minions, we wouldn't have had those experiences. Then again, we would all be multimillionaire lightsabre wavers. Swings and roundabouts!

Happy Riding

Joel

gilghana1 16 Feb 2008 15:02

Why all the fuss!
 
Just got sent the series and watched it over a few weeks. Shit loads better than Eastenders and not as good as Lost. Makes it pretty much normal TV in my book - something to watch after work. Quite enjoyable, and if E & C have the cash to do it that way and in doing so make even more money then good luck to them...
G

craig76 16 Feb 2008 17:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by skysurferboy (Post 172318)
I thought that the Long Way idea had had its day after Race to Dakar. You know the one where Charly didn't last more than 5 days but tells everyone he meets that he did the Dakar. I think that was Simon that did it Charly not you. You were a spectator. But the public keep lapping it up.......

That's exactly it. They're painting a picture of themselves that they're the real deal, when quite clearly (to us anyway) they're not. It's not that they're unlikeable, they're just fake. Whether it's bikes, cars or anything else that I actually care about, I just can't stand people who are fake. If you're going to talk the talk, you've got to walk the walk as well and do it off your own back, not with someone holding your hand.

And so what if people's attitudes towards them are elitist. IMHO, people who have done the same trips, without C&E huge resources have earned that right.

Jeremy Clarkson is another one whose mouth has made him, in the public's eyes anyway, the definitive expert on everything 4 wheeled. Those who actually know what they're talking can see through him straight away. I can give quite a few specific examples but I'll keep it on topic. The Canonball and Gumball Rallies are full of people just like E&C, posing and trying to make themselves look like pseudo-racing drivers. Really, they're just irritating wankers with far too much money/time on they're hands.

As for the BMW GS, Bike magazine voted it the "coolest" bike ever made, whatever thats supposed to mean. Their saving grace was that they only meant ones that were battered to hell, caked in mud and still had import tax stickers on it from wherever it's owner had taken it. Ones bought for "bopping around Kensington" as they put it were definitely "not cool". So, when was the last time you saw one that wasn't cleaner than clean?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04.


vB.Sponsors