Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB

Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/)
-   Yamaha Tech (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/yamaha-tech/)
-   -   Drum vs. disc brakes? (https://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hubb/yamaha-tech/drum-vs-disc-brakes-24088)

electric!sheep 10 Nov 2006 19:30

Drum vs. disc brakes?
 
I have a 1984 TT600 (AHRMA classic BTW) and a 1986 XT600 with a Tenere tank. I'm not one into major restorations to have a garage queen of a TT, so I just want to take the nice suspension of the TT and toss it in the XT. The rear suspension looks like a drop-in swap (right?), and adds 1" of travel and a lot of adjustment.

The front also adds 1"...but I also would be forced to switch to drum brakes up front, instead of the fairly beefy front disk on the XT600. I'm hesitant to just swap the rear, because that would reduce trail, whereas a full suspension swap would increase it.

I can see the simplicity and reliability of the drum being a plus, but...will it stop me fast enough? I'm not doing any motard and typically run knobbies. Is it ok off-road? Is it safe around town or on the highway? Fully loaded with fuel the bike weighs 350lb, plus 150lb for me, with the possibility of another 50lb in gear.

DougieB 10 Nov 2006 21:05

£13 buys you Motorcycle Roadcraft (it's a book!), which will explain how to plan your road riding better so you don't need to use the brakes much at all. Maybe less hassle? You would actually have to read it mind you, simply buying the book doesn't improve your forward planning.

drum brakes take longer to stop you, but if you're looking further up the road it's no big deal.

electric!sheep 10 Nov 2006 21:38

Strangest response ever. Maybe I should remove the brakes entirely and rely on compression braking? Just need to look further up the road, right. :smartass:

Seriously though, I have no idea how drum brakes differ from disc. Is it 25% more stopping distance? 50%? 100%? I want to be able to respond to emergency situations with confidence (not...OMG WHEN AM I GOING TO STOP???), but I don't need to do reverse wheelies either. That's the question. I might just end up doing the swap and seeing how it works out.

Looking up the road is fine and good, but sometimes you need to stop RIGHT NOW or slow the f- down because of a wash/barbed wire/chupacabra around a blind corner.

electric!sheep 10 Nov 2006 21:49

How about an existentialist response: Does it matter if I stop? I could look further up the road, or I could use powerful brakes, but in a meaningless world, it is of no consequence whether I slow down or not; for to continue or to remain is an illusory distinction. If once, I saw stopping as the purpose in pressing the brake lever, I can now see the ultimate, inevitable finality of human existence in that simple motion--something that is far more poignant than merely coming to a halt at a red light. When the dark moment comes and I fly into the side of a car, this knowledge will provide me solace that no brakes could ever provide.

DougieB 11 Nov 2006 08:16

drum brakes were standard before, and I suspect (though it's a wild guess) just the same amount of people crashed (cars and bikes) as they do now. nothing to do with being able to stop quickly, a lot to do with not looking further up the road! ;)

seriously though, drum brakes overheat and then are useless till they cool down (same as disc fluid overheating). but I guess you're not headed to a track day. if you really don't know, then go with the drums and you'll learn the difference for yourself. new cables and new shoes make a difference, but the 'how quickly do they stop me' question is a bit subjective. try them.

but if you plan to run knobblies then you are already reducing the potential stopping power of your brakes (not enough rubber on the road). an utterly unscientific guess for drum effectiveness, for me, would be 75% of the power of discs. that would be comparing a like for like bike, not an old XT vs a new GS. On a decent drum setup you can lock the front. Do you use your disc brakes at 75% or more of their potential? Maybe not if you have knobblies on.

having said that I ploughed through a Nigerian road block because my drum brakes wouldn't stop me in time. I think disc brakes would have saved me an awful lot of hassle that day.

brettsyoung 11 Nov 2006 08:57

Drum brakes fail when they get hot or wet. If there is lots of downhills, rain, puddles etc in your travels then go for the disks. Drums are ancient technology and can be really dangerous - you are going back 50 years to consider regressing to drums.

DougieB 12 Nov 2006 20:34

50 year old technology? do you ever use a pencil, does it work? so why do aeroplanes still fly, because they recognised the bad technology of old, and re-invented the plane? age doesn't make technology bad.

The guy has an old TT and an old XT, and is happily talking about an inch of suspension difference not being an issue (which it ain't). I don't think modern technology (which obviously makes things easier for us) is overly important in this case, just being able to stop. Which drum brakes have been doing for at least 50 years, like you say...

DougieB 12 Nov 2006 20:39

"How about an existentialist response: Does it matter if I stop? I could look further up the road, or I could use powerful brakes, but in a meaningless world, it is of no consequence whether I slow down or not; for to continue or to remain is an illusory distinction. If once, I saw stopping as the purpose in pressing the brake lever, I can now see the ultimate, inevitable finality of human existence in that simple motion--something that is far more poignant than merely coming to a halt at a red light. When the dark moment comes and I fly into the side of a car, this knowledge will provide me solace that no brakes could ever provide."

that's surely nonsense ;)

sipke 17 Nov 2006 19:22

Didn't really want to say this but 350lb fully loaded?:eek3:

No way:cool4: Mine is 157kg (bit less than 350lb if i'm not to much mistaken?) and it took me a year to get it there:
http://i10.tinypic.com/30rmwk1.jpg

Anyway, a drumbrake will get you in trouble. The extra inch will help it offroad, but only in the back and not that much. I would keep the TT as it is ( it's a classic dude:thumbup1: ) and modify the XT: shorten the doglink so it wont hit the cases and fit a longer shock. Pick up an old WP4054-fork from an old KTM or TM at the breakers if you want to improve the front, cheap and a straight fit.:biggrin3:

DougieB 5 Dec 2006 00:48

what did you do? drums, discs or prayers?

oldbmw 5 Dec 2006 15:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrettUAE
Drum brakes fail when they get hot or wet. If there is lots of downhills, rain, puddles etc in your travels then go for the disks. Drums are ancient technology and can be really dangerous - you are going back 50 years to consider regressing to drums.


So are wheels, but they work well enough.

Drum brakes are easier to field repair in wild places...exactly the place where any more braking would likely lock the front. The twin ls front brake as fitted to 69 triumphs were better than any bike disk brake until 73-74. Now virtually all bike front brakes are better. BUT bikes have become much heavier, and are now able to ride on roads that allow/insist on much higher speeds.

electric!sheep 6 Dec 2006 05:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by DougieB
what did you do? drums, discs or prayers?

Nothing yet, got side-tracked with my Zodiac boat. I think I'll see about swapping the triples this weekend. I really want to see what the drum feels like, just so I know. The thing I really want out of the TT suspension is not so much the travel, but the cadillac-like plushness. My XT suspension is extremely stiff since the previous owner tried to (over)compensate for the 8 gal Tenere tank. I don't mind a little dive for a super-pliant ride over the rocks.

electric!sheep 6 Dec 2006 05:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldbmw
Drum brakes are easier to field repair in wild places...exactly the place where any more braking would likely lock the front.

That's one line of reasoning in favor. I LIKE simplicity on the principle of it. The less that can go wrong, and the easier it is to fix, the better.

Mr. Ron 6 Dec 2006 06:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldbmw
Drum brakes are easier to field repair in wild places...exactly the place where any more braking would likely lock the front. The twin ls front brake as fitted to 69 triumphs were better than any bike disk brake until 73-74. Now virtually all bike front brakes are better. BUT bikes have become much heavier, and are now able to ride on roads that allow/insist on much higher speeds.

I have to question this line of thinking. Drum brakes are far more complicated than disk brakes. Here's my case:
-Drum brakes activate on a cam, which must ride on either a bushing or bearing. Both are prone to wear.
-Drum brakes use springs, which are prone to breaking and possibly dificult to find a suitable replacement.
-When drums rust, your brakes will stick until everything is worn away.
-Drum brakes SUCK when they get wet!
-Drum brakes are dinosaur technology and were replaced with a simpler, more eficient disc system.
-Drum brakes need some form of adjustment, probably a cable. That being said, cable operated brakes are grosely ineficient with more parts to maintain.
-All cars all around the world operate with disk brakes. This means if you can find a mechanic that fixes brakes, they will most likely be able to help you.
-Almost all bikes in the world have disk brakes, so parts can be found or altered in a pinch.
Disc brakes are incredibly simple, self adjusting and efficient.They have a minimum amount of moving parts, and are all hydraulicly operated. They are very easy to maintain. It's your brakes and how you use them that will save your life in certain circumstances. Given the choice, i would never swap diacs for drum brakes. :)

smokinrider 6 Dec 2006 10:25

whilst we are discussing this ill give my opinion.
drum brakes are sh*t. wet they dont work, muddy they dont work, worn slightly they dont work and when travelling at speed or load they dont work.
i think motorcycle manufacturers knew this so thats why they changed to disc brakes. simple and effective.
Anyone who considers going from disc to drum is a sandwich short of a picnic. the bike which has a disc has it for a reason. to stop the bike. clearly if drum brakes were better or even close to the same performance we would still be using them today on the front wheel.

If your going to retro fit a drum brake i would suggest taking the starter motor off of your car and replacing it with the trusty starting handle. same for the bike, junk the e start and fit a kick. hell whilst your at it remove all the light bulbs from your house and fit candles in their place. why not move into a cave and do away with 1000's of years of evolution all together.

DRUM brakes, i ask you. what next.

rickg 6 Dec 2006 14:38

like he says, drums are history.

On the road a big trail bike and drums don't mix, I could get one maybe one or two fast stops on a Suzuki SP400 or XT500 before the lever was back at the bars due to the drum expanding with heat. You really are onto a loser with a small drum, heavy bike and a big wheel e.g. old trail bikes that'll top 70mph

In the mud and deep water they are a liability as the mud gets into the works and takes an age before the crap clears from the shoes, if it ever does, otherwise it's a strip-down. That's when you discover the cam bearing has worn oval because it's got full of that mud which wouldn't come out..

So drums vs disks..let's see how many performance bikes (road or dirt) we can count that still use drums.. one..(no that's a Harley)..errr..

electric!sheep 6 Dec 2006 15:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by smokinrider
If your going to retro fit a drum brake i would suggest taking the starter motor off of your car and replacing it with the trusty starting handle.

Well, my housemate now has to park on hills with the car I sold him for $150. So who needs a starter motor, or handle for that matter?

Quote:

Originally Posted by smokinrider
same for the bike, junk the e start and fit a kick.

Never had an e-start, and got the XT because I didn't want one. Even though I have bad knees.

Quote:

Originally Posted by smokinrider
why not move into a cave and do away with 1000's of years of evolution all together.

My cave is quite comfortable, thank you very much.

As for my brow ridge, DON'T EVEN GO THERE.

martyboy 6 Dec 2006 16:10

Drum versus disc, no contest, disc wins.
I`d go with spike, use another setup on front to give you the lift that has a disc fitted

oldbmw 6 Dec 2006 21:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Ron
I have to question this line of thinking. Drum brakes are far more complicated than disk brakes. Here's my case:

-Drum brakes activate on a cam, which must ride on either a bushing or bearing. Both are prone to wear.
-Drum brakes use springs, which are prone to breaking and possibly dificult to find a suitable replacement.
I have Never had to replace either springs or bushings, but if i did need to, any village blacksmith in the third world would be able to fix it.

-When drums rust, your brakes will stick until everything is worn away.
-Drum brakes SUCK when they get wet!
same applies to disks...

-Drum brakes are dinosaur technology and were replaced with a simpler, more eficient disc system.
Dinasaurs were around longer than mammals, many beleive they evolved into birds.

-Drum brakes need some form of adjustment, probably a cable. That being said, cable operated brakes are grosely ineficient with more parts to maintain.
maybe so, but they easily non technically fixable...

-All cars all around the world operate with disk brakes. This means if you can find a mechanic that fixes brakes, they will most likely be able to help you.
-Almost all bikes in the world have disk brakes, so parts can be found or altered in a pinch.
ok, go into your ford garage and get your motorbike seals or pads replaced.

Disc brakes are incredibly simple, self adjusting and efficient.They have a minimum amount of moving parts, and are all hydraulicly operated. They are very easy to maintain. It's your brakes and how you use them that will save your life in certain circumstances. Given the choice, i would never swap diacs for drum brakes. :)

Actually, i did not say modern disk brakes were worse than drum, just that in third world countries drums are about sufficient, and more maintainable.

oldbmw 6 Dec 2006 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by smokinrider

If your going to retro fit a drum brake i would suggest taking the starter motor off of your car and replacing it with the trusty starting handle. same for the bike, junk the e start and fit a kick.

DRUM brakes, i ask you. what next.

Most modern ignition systems wont start on a flat battery because the electronics need near full voltage to operate the ignition syatem. So a kickstart wont work. Nor can you bumpstart. On all of my old Triumphs i just had to turn the ignition switch to emergency if i had left the lights on and had a flat battery. it would then start as normal.

Understand, the bike and features I would want for touring third world countries are no necessarily what I would choose for western Europe. You have to be in a rural area out of mobile phone contact before you can appreciate the different needs.

Mr. Ron 6 Dec 2006 21:49

I'm Changing Over!
 
Well, i'm convinced! I'm changing over tomorrow! Bloody disk brakes with Everything that can fail on them....no, the Ludites are correct! Why have a nearly maintinence free system when you can give some blacksmith in Somalia a job forging a spring or laminating a new pad onto a shoe. Or maybe give the Bolivian bikeshop some business replacing a frayed cable or turning a new bushing?
...yeh, right. Great idea!....Use drum brakes! They're easier to fix???... After all, the third world has never heard of such a revolutionary item as disk brakes. After all, in the third world, who needs brakes?
This is getting silly, time to move on.
I just hope Electric Sheep can tell the diference between good advise and bad advise.

John Ferris 6 Dec 2006 23:21

Calm down Mr Ron, the last I knew you had both drums and disc brakes.
Or did you buy a "modern bike".

electric!sheep 7 Dec 2006 01:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Ron
Well, i'm convinced! I'm changing over tomorrow! Bloody disk brakes with Everything that can fail on them....no, the Ludites are correct! Why have a nearly maintinence free system when you can give some blacksmith in Somalia a job forging a spring or laminating a new pad onto a shoe. Or maybe give the Bolivian bikeshop some business replacing a frayed cable or turning a new bushing?

Well, let's compare disc brake to drum brake failures, and see how you'd deal with either in the bush. How am I going to get a tribesman to rebuild my master cylinder? With drum brakes, I could make a bushing from wood, pads from bark, a spring from the bones of a small fish, a cable from antelope sinew, etc.

:lol2:

Mr. Ron 7 Dec 2006 01:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Ferris
Calm down Mr Ron, the last I knew you had both drums and disc brakes.
Or did you buy a "modern bike".

Yeh, your right! I can honestly say i speak from experience. Actually, it's kind of funny, i ordered a new set of shoes today. $112!! Can you beleive that!?!
BTW...They suck! I'm glad its on the back, if i put all my weight into the pedal i can start to feel something hapening back there
Over on Adventrider Ricardo Kuhn is doing some interesting work on trying to retrofit a 2nd gen. Paralever bevel onto a first gen. swingarm. They actually seem pretty close in dimensions. Unfortunately when my drum finally goes i'll have to replace the whole hub $$$. Do you know if they can be re-lined?
Mr. Sheep. Please do whatever makes you feel comfortable. If you really feel that drum brakes are easier to fix/maintain, then go ahead and do the swap. I hope you have a strong right forearm and good judgement of distance to the car in front of you ;)

AliBaba 7 Dec 2006 09:27

I’m not a big fan of drum brakes, but I still have one left on the bike.

IMHO you can almost always fix a drum brake with your toolkit and an extra wire if it fails in the middle of nowhere. It might be hard to fix a hydraulic hose, brake-cylinder or caliper without parts (I never carry brake-fluid or spare gaskets).

At two different occasions I have seen bikes where stones have come between the swing arm and rear wheel and trashed the disk (once the caliper was also gone).
On my bike(s) I have spend far more time on money on servicing the disk brakes then the drum brakes.

http://www.actiontouring.com/IS2003_0150.jpg
(From a remote spot on Iceland. It’s not easy to see on the picture but the disk is bended so much that you could not fit the caliper)

Status after 180kkm:

Disk (front):
Changed brake pads three times
Changed brake line
Changed master cylinder
Overhauled caliper
Changed disk

Drum (rear):
Changed brake pads two times
Changed brake wire

But the disk is superior in braking force and I would never mount a drum in the front.

So one of the reasons I have kept my drum rear brake is because it always work and I can fix it everywhere.

oldbmw 7 Dec 2006 21:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliBaba
I’m not a big fan of drum brakes, but I still have one left on the bike.

IMHO you can almost always fix a drum brake with your toolkit and an extra wire if it fails in the middle of nowhere. It might be hard to fix a hydraulic hose, brake-cylinder or caliper without parts (I never carry brake-fluid or spare gaskets).

At two different occasions I have seen bikes where stones have come between the swing arm and rear wheel and trashed the disk (once the caliper was also gone).
On my bike(s) I have spend far more time on money on servicing the disk brakes then the drum brakes.

http://www.actiontouring.com/IS2003_0150.jpg
(From a remote spot on Iceland. It’s not easy to see on the picture but the disk is bended so much that you could not fit the caliper)

Status after 180kkm:

Disk (front):
Changed brake pads three times
Changed brake line
Changed master cylinder
Overhauled caliper
Changed disk

Drum (rear):
Changed brake pads two times
Changed brake wire

But the disk is superior in braking force and I would never mount a drum in the front.

So one of the reasons I have kept my drum rear brake is because it always work and I can fix it everywhere.

Thanks Alibaba, I agree modern disk brakes have more stopping power, They stopped the 'long way round crew' until a tech rep was flown out from Germany to their bike in russia because their support team mechanics could not fix a brake problem. I dont mean to misguide anyone, if you in western Europe or N america, disk brakes would be my choice. But off the beaten track not. However I dont think i would take the trouble to swap either way... provided the front and rear were separate systems, so at least I could continue if one failed. Unfortunately the Bmw of 'long Way Round' had a linked system, so when the ABS failed it left the bike with NO brakes at all. (contrary to the sales hype). Frankly these days I do most of my riding in UK,France, Belgium, Germany and Spain and am of the credit card +mobile phone breakdown philosophy in that environment. Out side of that comfort zone it can get down to mole grips and wire :)

milkman 15 Dec 2006 11:05

Stray cow, deer, kid. car ect etc.
I want disks.

I have an SR500 that was converted from a disk to a drum front fo the cafe racer look, but it takes all the racer out of it as I don't go fast as the breaks wont stop me in time.

Disks for sure if you can.

milkman 15 Dec 2006 11:12

I meant brakes, not breaks.....


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:53.


vB.Sponsors