14Likes
|
|
1 Feb 2013
|
Banned
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 971
|
|
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaldBaBoon
I am sure the world is full of nice, decent people who just want to get on with life etc etc...
|
Thats exactly the point. Been in "war" countrys many times and always was surprised how friendly the people where. Didnt feel unsafe at all, informed my self were the landmines are and got offered fresh fruits instead of being kidnapped.
Anyway if it comes to the politics every million spend in the rescue of people cant be wasted to financially rescue banks, build projects that become even more expensive at the end and so on.
|
1 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 296
|
|
Hi, i agree with the sentiment of a number of the posts that you are in no more danger than in a UK city. I took my 18 year old son on a 2 month tour (he only passed his test a few months earlier) including places like Russia, Moldova, Bulgaria, Albania, etc not real hot spots but enough for his mother to worry. She did hower accept that he was probably at less risk than going into the centre of Glasgow for a with his mates on a Saturday night. Andy
|
1 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Touring Ted*
Every time you put your trousers on you take a risk.. Riding a bike instead of a car is another huge risk. Life is full of danger and you just get on with it.
*****
That's not an option for most though is it. It's a necessary risk. For many an overlander, the dangers of foreign lands is an educated risk and it's not an option for many to hide under their duvet.
|
I disagree...are you seriously suggesting that putting your pants on in the morning is as dangerous as a pleasure cruise down the Somali coast or a joy ride through northern Mali? Obviously there are risks, and there are risks, and not everyone is as good as they should be at determining when risk exceeds a reasonable level. Clearly this is a very subjective issue, but...
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Touring Ted*
Is it fair to put the police/army etc at risk by doing more dangerous things ??
No one joins the army thinking they might never get shot at. No one joins the police thinking they'll never be put into dangerous situations with criminals.
It's an educated risk they take too. They could of become paper shuffler or website designers instead if they wanted a safer life.
|
I completely disagree with this argument. The fact that soldiers/police are willing to risk their lives does not mean that they should have to do so to save from idiot from themselves. The fact that many of them volunteer for the army, or even if they volunteer for particular rescue missions, does not mean that it is right to put their lives at risk by undertaking foolish activities.
|
1 Feb 2013
|
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 374
|
|
I think it all comes down to how you manage and mitigate those risks. People who blunder in with little preparation and get themselves into trouble really do put others at risk, unfairly IMHO. On the other hand well prepared people who
find themselves in an unexpected situation, well that is a whole different story.
I do get quite annoyed by those people who go places, like say Somalia, get kidnapped, held for ransom and then they or their families complain that their government is not doing enough/didn't do enough by refusing to negotiate with the hostage takers.
To that end I have actually instructed our family if we do get caught in hostage situation not to negotiate.
|
2 Feb 2013
|
|
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wirral, England.
Posts: 5,673
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by motoreiter
I disagree...are you seriously suggesting that putting your pants on in the morning is as dangerous as a pleasure cruise down the Somali coast or a joy ride through northern Mali?
No, I'm not..... And I didn't say that. Did I ??
I completely disagree with this argument. The fact that soldiers/police are willing to risk their lives does not mean that they should have to do so to save from idiot from themselves. The fact that many of them volunteer for the army, or even if they volunteer for particular rescue missions, does not mean that it is right to put their lives at risk by undertaking foolish activities.
|
So where should one draw the line ???? It's an impossible situation.
Should I drop driving my car because I might run over a child ? If I was walking I wouldn't be able to hurt anyone ?
Should I never go hill walking in case I break my ankle and a rescue team have to risk themselves to save me ??
If I was unselfish, I'd stop riding my bike because if I crash an ambulance crew might get run over while they're tending to me...
I'm being intentionally ridiculous because it's a ridiculous notion to suggest that we can change the way we live our lives on a global scale to reduce the risks to other people that we have very little affect on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig.iedema
I think it all comes down to how you manage and mitigate those risks. People who blunder in with little preparation and get themselves into trouble really do put others at risk, unfairly IMHO. On the other hand well prepared people who
find themselves in an unexpected situation, well that is a whole different story.
I do get quite annoyed by those people who go places, like say Somalia, get kidnapped, held for ransom and then they or their families complain that their government is not doing enough/didn't do enough by refusing to negotiate with the hostage takers.
To that end I have actually instructed our family if we do get caught in hostage situation not to negotiate.
|
Craig sums it up quite nicely.......
I'm not going to feel overly guilty if I have to get rescued by Sudanese police in Khartoum but I wouldn't expect them to come and pull me out of a firefight in Darfur.
I have a suspicion that in these countries/situations, the unofficial protocol would be:
"screw you mate, you shouldn't be there anyway"...
__________________
Did some trips.
Rode some bikes.
Fix them for a living.
Can't say anymore.
|
2 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 114
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andysr6
Hi, i agree with the sentiment of a number of the posts that you are in no more danger than in a UK city. I took my 18 year old son on a 2 month tour (he only passed his test a few months earlier) including places like Russia, Moldova, Bulgaria, Albania, etc not real hot spots but enough for his mother to worry. She did hower accept that he was probably at less risk than going into the centre of Glasgow for a with his mates on a Saturday night. Andy
|
That's a pretty good take on it...I sat in a bar in Bosnia where one wall had been shot to pieces and barman looked like a hitman but at no time was there anything like what you see any Friday night if you go into Brighton,no punch ups and girls dragging each other round by the hair...
|
4 Feb 2013
|
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 374
|
|
And what is risky anyway? Should say you travel to a country with a homicide rate 6 times your home country? That instantly rules the US for an Aussie. Naturally the US is not a dangerous place to travel (well maybe if you eat what everyone else does ) and nor are many of these so called dangerous places. I just spent 2 weeks in Mexico, great place.
|
17 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: J10 M40 UK
Posts: 362
|
|
What a question on a mainly Motor cycle forum , which must rate as one of the riskiest activities going
regarding involving others , there are a lot of people making a good living out of dealing with things that go pear shaped , and they do it from choice ( I know I did) .
As long as you are not stupid , live life , Que Sera sera JMHO
|
17 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
New on the HUBB
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
|
|
I didn't read every response to this original thread but is Tacr2man the first to grasp the question? It's 'do we have the right?' n'est pas? Not an invitation to define or quantify risk but a question, should we expect to be saved when it all goes wrong?
In my opinion, we should not. If we need help and it comes, its a blessing, if it doesn't, we must accept the consequences. An uncomfortable truth but I believe that's the diference between adventure and tourism.
|
17 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
HUBB regular
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 28
|
|
I beleive that we do have the right. However, as with every other risky activity, it is selfish to act in a wreckless manner. If you act within your skills and ability then I don't see the problem. Any individual who may be involved in a rescue - be it mountain rescue or military rescue - has already made their own decision that they believe it is worth while to put themselves in a risky situation to rescue someone.
There is always an element of luck. You can never know for sure if there are kidnappers in the area, if the snow slope is going to give way or if the driver coming towards you is steaming drunk. It just educated guessing. The more educated the guess, the less selfish the act, the more you have the right.
|
17 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,131
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by motoreiter
The fact that many of them volunteer for the army, or even if they volunteer for particular rescue missions, does not mean that it is right to put their lives at risk by undertaking foolish activities.
|
Who decides what is a foolish activity?
Some would have stopped Columbus going to America...
NASA considered the space shuttle safe ... but has made some improvements after a number of deaths.
Sorry but the committee on deciding what is a 'foolish activity' does not exist. And that is a good thing. People make poor choices all the time - look at traffic crashes. Most of the time we get away with it. Some times others help. People who go to help also make choices.
|
18 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warin
Who decides what is a foolish activity?
Some would have stopped Columbus going to America...
NASA considered the space shuttle safe ... but has made some improvements after a number of deaths.
|
Both of your examples are off the mark--we are not talking about putting yourself at risk, of course you have the right to do whatever you want with your own safety. We are talking about putting the lives of potential rescuers at risk. Clearly, neither astronauts nor Columbus could have expected any rescue (and thus no rescuers are involved).
|
18 Feb 2013
|
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chiang Mai, Thailand
Posts: 193
|
|
"There is a special place in hell for those who expectedly place others at risk pursuing their own 'rights'." - paraphrasing Dante.
As an American I'm SHOCKED at how often my countrymen expect "rescue" for contriving a crisis that could have been avoided with a bit of preparation, pluck and ahem, "independence".
Without risks . . . there are few rewards. It's a balance that should be considered a priori. If "ignorance of the law is no excuse" then ignorance of the risks is inexcusable.
"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." - Helen Keller
__________________
Orange, it's the new black.
|
18 Feb 2013
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,131
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by motoreiter
We are talking about putting the lives of potential rescuers at risk.
|
Missed some points.
The rescuee ASKS for help.
Rescuers make the CHOICE. As do ambos, police and fire ... they all make a choice at each situation, even if it is not a 'rescue'. Each individual evaluates the risk/reward and make the decision on going ahead or backing out. If you are a first aider you should know that. It is not compulsory for any one to place their life at risk for another. The rescuer makes the choice (and should evaluate and minimize their risk), not the rescuee.
Who rescues the rescuer?
---------------------------------
If the 'safety committee' thing is done then even those who don't want rescue will be denied. Because "it is too dangerous". Hence NASA, Columbus etc.
==================
The press here in OZ raises the issue of rescue costs, particularly where a 'round the world yacht' is involved.. lots of $$$$ estimated by accountants there. They forget that those services would be idle or practicing without the rescue.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 Registered Users and/or Members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Check the RAW segments; Grant, your HU host is on every month!
Episodes below to listen to while you, err, pretend to do something or other...
2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.
"Ultimate global guide for red-blooded bikers planning overseas exploration. Covers choice & preparation of best bike, shipping overseas, baggage design, riding techniques, travel health, visas, documentation, safety and useful addresses." Recommended. (Grant)
Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance™ combines into a single integrated program the best evacuation and rescue with the premier travel insurance coverages designed for adventurers.
Led by special operations veterans, Stanford Medicine affiliated physicians, paramedics and other travel experts, Ripcord is perfect for adventure seekers, climbers, skiers, sports enthusiasts, hunters, international travelers, humanitarian efforts, expeditions and more.
Ripcord travel protection is now available for ALL nationalities, and travel is covered on motorcycles of all sizes!
What others say about HU...
"This site is the BIBLE for international bike travelers." Greg, Australia
"Thank you! The web site, The travels, The insight, The inspiration, Everything, just thanks." Colin, UK
"My friend and I are planning a trip from Singapore to England... We found (the HU) site invaluable as an aid to planning and have based a lot of our purchases (bikes, riding gear, etc.) on what we have learned from this site." Phil, Australia
"I for one always had an adventurous spirit, but you and Susan lit the fire for my trip and I'll be forever grateful for what you two do to inspire others to just do it." Brent, USA
"Your website is a mecca of valuable information and the (video) series is informative, entertaining, and inspiring!" Jennifer, Canada
"Your worldwide organisation and events are the Go To places to for all serious touring and aspiring touring bikers." Trevor, South Africa
"This is the answer to all my questions." Haydn, Australia
"Keep going the excellent work you are doing for Horizons Unlimited - I love it!" Thomas, Germany
Lots more comments here!
Diaries of a compulsive traveller
by Graham Field
Book, eBook, Audiobook
"A compelling, honest, inspiring and entertaining writing style with a built-in feel-good factor" Get them NOW from the authors' website and Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.co.uk.
Back Road Map Books and Backroad GPS Maps for all of Canada - a must have!
New to Horizons Unlimited?
New to motorcycle travelling? New to the HU site? Confused? Too many options? It's really very simple - just 4 easy steps!
Horizons Unlimited was founded in 1997 by Grant and Susan Johnson following their journey around the world on a BMW R80G/S.
Read more about Grant & Susan's story
Membership - help keep us going!
Horizons Unlimited is not a big multi-national company, just two people who love motorcycle travel and have grown what started as a hobby in 1997 into a full time job (usually 8-10 hours per day and 7 days a week) and a labour of love. To keep it going and a roof over our heads, we run events all over the world with the help of volunteers; we sell inspirational and informative DVDs; we have a few selected advertisers; and we make a small amount from memberships.
You don't have to be a Member to come to an HU meeting, access the website, or ask questions on the HUBB. What you get for your membership contribution is our sincere gratitude, good karma and knowing that you're helping to keep the motorcycle travel dream alive. Contributing Members and Gold Members do get additional features on the HUBB. Here's a list of all the Member benefits on the HUBB.
|
|
|