|
|
12 Feb 2009
|
|
Moderated Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DogZone Country
Posts: 1,218
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CornishDeity
As far as I am aware the British government was one of the first people to get it's citizens out of Guantanamo. It was the residence and others that they did not help (why should they???). I totally do not agree with Guantanamo BTW. They should fight to close it yes, but if you are complaining about the way the govenment interferes with British citizens you are choicing the wrong example, I am led to believe anyhow. If you know different let me know please!
I do agree that the state is by no means benign, but I just ask for a little bit of balance. To the everyday Jo, this country has a lot of good things going for it. To compare this in ANY way to Nazi Germany, as has been implied in other posts, to me shows either ignorance of what went on 70 years ago, or just a very bad argument.
Bit there are problems I do agree, but keep the scale correct is all I ask.
But to me, this debate is important ....... and the only way to keep it serious is to keep the hyperbole out and the facts in.
|
Hi Ollie
No hyperbole BTW- not from me anyway. I did not say the UK was the worst, so you'll need to rethink that... And I didnt link the UK to Nazi Germany; please read the post accurately - find out about the word "Stasi". I also mentioned several issues where the UK has denied liberties that were hard won; you don't refer to these issues.
Liberty is not a privilege handed out by governments. It doesn't belong to them like some commodity.
I am against complacency in the UK, where people imagine that everything's OK. Don't forget you are a "subject" in the UK, whose Head of State is a monarch; a country without a written Constitution, and whose Upper House is stuffed with unelected geriatrics.
It's lucky we are also at least European citizens.
Come on Ollie - you've got a lot of reading to catch up on!
|
12 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 671
|
|
A bit at a time
OK Linz - challenge accepted and Taking Libertiesordered from Amazon, and due to being a prime customer should arrive tomorrow I will read it asap.
Of course I will read it in the same vein as anything that could be slanted tomwards one side (great example Michael Moore films- yes I am anti bush/war etc, but one has to to the whole truth, otherwise it is just propoganda !!). Looking forward to it.
Cammie - from my response you may think I hold the opposite view to you, but I am not. I am very much a libertarian, and anti monarchy etc etc. But I am also a commited realistic and optimist. Trust me, I am more anti big brother than most, but if all it does it protect us (really not government spin) then, well maybe I am prepared to accept that vs some other 'nasties' that could be coming our way.
Vive la revolution! But be nice too
PS - I may have dragged this thread a little of the original topic. Sorry
|
12 Feb 2009
|
|
Moderated Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DogZone Country
Posts: 1,218
|
|
Ollie -let's agree that Cromwell had the right idea!!!!!
|
12 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 671
|
|
Shhh
Cromwell is not a good name for me to mention, being called Oliver and living in Ireland.
Luckily all Irish are well aware that the Cornish are brothers in arms ....!!!!
|
13 Feb 2009
|
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorkshire UK
Posts: 106
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caminando
Well Steve, just ask former East Germans about mass state surveillance. I just met a guy who was tortured by the Stasi. You may not be interested in state surveillance, but state surveillance is interested in you.
|
I don't really see how the secret police of the GDR fit into this argument in any way, the UK isn't East Germany and storing detailed records of people leaving and entering the country for ten years isn't going to turn us into it either!
|
13 Feb 2009
|
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorkshire UK
Posts: 106
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caminando
Don't forget you are a "subject" in the UK, whose Head of State is a monarch; a country without a written Constitution, and whose Upper House is stuffed with unelected geriatrics.
|
I have never really understood why people raise this as an issue, yes we are subjects rather than citizens, yes we have no constitution, but how many other countries enjoy more personal freedoms than we do?
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 671
|
|
Thought experiment
OK - heres a thought experiment - imagine saying how bad a country this is to live in to someone from the Nazi era, or Stalin Era, Or current Zimbabwe.
Personally I think you would end up feeling pretty goddam embarrassed for not appreciating what you have got, before complaining.
That’s all I ask people, look at the positives, not the just the negatives.
Linzi's experience with the guy who took his boomerang away, the guy was just a dick, and there’s tonnes of them all round the world! It wasn't a sign that we're about to be woken up during the night to have all our boomerangs confiscated. It was a one off stupid act by a stupid man.
Love and Peace
Ollie
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 619
|
|
Hi Ollie, yes with immigration officers, on return to UK the staff couldn't have been more different and the coutesy shown me was just right. I see what you mean in keeping it in perspective. Years ago I was sitting on a lovely French hill chatting to a German guy who at 17 years old had run over the closed German border, dogs, lights, wall, mines etc! I said how restricted I found West Germany to be. He said that from his perspective in East Germany he found it pleasingly slack. He lived in a converted van! Perspectives and comparisons. My problem is that I compare everything here with New Zealand and what I value is hardly to be found here now. But when I read more about our loss of freedoms I became depressed and angry. The problem is that things could and should be so much better here. Further that we lost so much so recently and all without us noticing. But I agree with you. We were talking at cross purposes. Linzi.
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 671
|
|
Yes! Let's strive for the very best, if not just for us, but future generations.
I'll try reading some of the book over the weekend Linz .. I might be picketing Starbucks by Monday
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 619
|
|
Yeh
Hm, some years ago an Aussie I met made a comment. He had noticed that Scots all seemed to hold opinions on everything. Careful here what he meant and I think correctly noticed is that Scots aren't laissez faire types. I have to live with my upbringing! Someone else once commented that if I dressed as a hippy I'd not be able to pull off the act. Uptight? No, it's some sort of "But it could be better". It is incidentally applied even more harshly inwards! I have just recieved a parcel from South America and it got through customs unchecked. Great! Now I'm off out to sell the contents in small portions and hope to make a big profit and pay for new barrels and pistons for my bike--final trip prepartations! I'm talking hand made knitted products by the way! Linzi.
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 208
|
|
Steved – I don’t really think you understand the arguments here or the full implications of what the government is trying to achieve. Comparisons with Nazi Germany, the GDR, USSR, Burma etc are not exact and never could be but they do serve as warnings of what other governments have done and therefore, serve as useful analogies of what could take place in the UK under malevolent circumstances. You ask what malevolent circumstances? - Black Swans! It is worth noting however, that only five other common law countries have introduced compulsory ID cards and it is debatable if even those countries are real countries at all. That in itself should be indicative of something.
The UK will never be like those country’s but then those country’s were (and are) different from each other. Except in one respect; their governments took great care to record each and every detail of citizen’s lives, their ethnicity, their location, their movements, their associations and many more data “of interest to the state”. The UK National Identity Register will require each and every person in the UK to attend their designated interrogation centre where you will be compelled to furnish the officers 66 (at this point in time) pieces of data about yourself. You will then be finger printed, iris scanned, photographed and if the association of Chief Police Officers have their way, a sample of your DNA taken and stored. Refusal to attend will result in fines and or imprisonment – you have no freedom to refuse, you have no choice in the matter. Then you will pay £120 for a plastic license which will entitle you to live in your own country. If you move you will have to inform the NIR of your new location. I won’t go into the reasons why they are intent on doing this (they change every few months as each previous and successive reason is challenged and demolished) but in business we have a maxim “you can’t manage what you can’t measure”. In short, your identity will become the property of the state. (“Property of the State” might seem an emotive phrase – in fact when I instructed my GP not to upload my medical records to the NHS database I was informed they didn’t belong to me, they belonged to the state and as an employee of the state they were obliged to upload them. Long story short, I had to withdraw from the NHS and now have no medical cover).
In the country’s mentioned above mass surveillance and ID cards did not protect or enhance the security of the people (the state excepted of course) but facilitated their subjugation.
You say you can’t see the problem with the state storing records of when you exit and return to the country for ten years but in doing so you miss the subtlety of the argument and ignore the other aspects of the function of this database. Why is the state storing your travel movements and what business is it of theirs where you are going, why you are going and with whom you are associating? Who is the arbiter here? Of course nothing will happen to you Steved, nothing happened to the vast majority of people in the countries mentioned above either.
The freedom even to ask this question didn’t come to you by accident, it came at the point of a gun, a pike staff and a sword and many people died to preserve that freedom so that you could ask this question so to shrug your shoulders as if to say “so what” and even to consider the risk of losing them is a breathtaking insult to the people who gave you those freedoms. Still, that’s the modern “Brit” for you.
Personally, I have given up on this nasty country anyway and have decided to leave. As OP of this thread I merely wanted to point out that the Labour party is trying to extend its’ reach, its’ surveillance on you outside of this country as well as inside and to attempt to monitor us even when we do leave. If you are happy with the state of affairs (which you seem to be) then by all means, drop your trousers, bend down and take it like they want you to but don’t be surprised if at some point you find it uncomfortable your eyes start to water. Whatever the case it won’t be my concern, you will have allowed it to happen. It’s a big risk you are taking. Good luck with that. Fingers crossed it will all be OK hey.
The biggest lie you will ever be told is “We are the Government – we are here to help you”.
__________________
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 208
|
|
Post Scrip: ...just heard that someone tried to take a picture of this facility at Wythenshawe. He was arrested and his camera taken off him.
__________________
|
13 Feb 2009
|
|
Moderated Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DogZone Country
Posts: 1,218
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CornishDeity
Cromwell is not a good name for me to mention, being called Oliver and living in Ireland.
Luckily all Irish are well aware that the Cornish are brothers in arms ....!!!!
|
You are quite right - my sincere apologies to all. I meant his solution to the Monarch problem, and didnt allow for his slaughter in Ireland.
|
13 Feb 2009
|
|
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorkshire UK
Posts: 106
|
|
Fastship I still don't see an issue with lots of the points you raise, and indeed I can see benefits in them, rather than quote the whole post I will just address a couple of points:
ID Card - I personally don't have any major issue with a national ID card scheme, in fact a comprehensive ID card scheme could be a convenience in many ways as it provides a single easy method of proving your identity, better than turning up at places with the collection of bank statements, utility bills, driving licences and passport. And having a foolproof (OK that may be optimistic) way of proving my identity could be a benefit.
A national DNA database - I am 100% in favour of this and if they introduced even a voluntary one I would submit my DNA straight away. Why we don't have this already, along with a fingerprint database I don't know, as long as access to them was limited to law enforcement then, in my opinion, the only people that would need to be concerned about them would be criminals.
Regarding e-borders and storing travel history again it is not something I am opposed to, I would imagine such data would be very useful to security services and law enforcement.
Could any of the above be abused, of course they could, but I don't automatically assume that they will be, and if they aren't abused then I certainly don't see them as a threat to personal freedom or liberty.
I suppose it all comes down to personal belief in what the information is being collected for, if you could please answer me the following question:
Assuming that a DNA database, ID cards and the full e-borders scheme was implemented and also assuming that they were used as they should be (access to the information by law enforcement and security services only) then what is the harm?
|
13 Feb 2009
|
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 208
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steved1969
I suppose it all comes down to personal belief in what the information is being collected for, if you could please answer me the following question:
Assuming that a DNA database, ID cards and the full e-borders scheme was implemented and also assuming that they were used as they should be (access to the information by law enforcement and security services only) then what is the harm?
|
umm honestly Steved - your child like trust and naivety is very touching and therefore I feel only able to pat you on the head and send you on your way - except for the fact that even if you sincerely hold such beliefs explain to me the right that you have to impose them on me?
I won't be drawn into ad hominem arguments but it is people like you (the majority) who have ruined this country and make me now want to not live here any longer. Your utopia is my dystopia.
One last thing - if for some reason I don't manage my escape and you are at the head of the queue to impose ID cards on me and my family - come well armed. You will need to be.
"In my Cold Dead Hand" - the only way you will make me carry an ID card...
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 Registered Users and/or Members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Check the RAW segments; Grant, your HU host is on every month!
Episodes below to listen to while you, err, pretend to do something or other...
2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.
"Ultimate global guide for red-blooded bikers planning overseas exploration. Covers choice & preparation of best bike, shipping overseas, baggage design, riding techniques, travel health, visas, documentation, safety and useful addresses." Recommended. (Grant)
Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance™ combines into a single integrated program the best evacuation and rescue with the premier travel insurance coverages designed for adventurers.
Led by special operations veterans, Stanford Medicine affiliated physicians, paramedics and other travel experts, Ripcord is perfect for adventure seekers, climbers, skiers, sports enthusiasts, hunters, international travelers, humanitarian efforts, expeditions and more.
Ripcord travel protection is now available for ALL nationalities, and travel is covered on motorcycles of all sizes!
What others say about HU...
"This site is the BIBLE for international bike travelers." Greg, Australia
"Thank you! The web site, The travels, The insight, The inspiration, Everything, just thanks." Colin, UK
"My friend and I are planning a trip from Singapore to England... We found (the HU) site invaluable as an aid to planning and have based a lot of our purchases (bikes, riding gear, etc.) on what we have learned from this site." Phil, Australia
"I for one always had an adventurous spirit, but you and Susan lit the fire for my trip and I'll be forever grateful for what you two do to inspire others to just do it." Brent, USA
"Your website is a mecca of valuable information and the (video) series is informative, entertaining, and inspiring!" Jennifer, Canada
"Your worldwide organisation and events are the Go To places to for all serious touring and aspiring touring bikers." Trevor, South Africa
"This is the answer to all my questions." Haydn, Australia
"Keep going the excellent work you are doing for Horizons Unlimited - I love it!" Thomas, Germany
Lots more comments here!
Diaries of a compulsive traveller
by Graham Field
Book, eBook, Audiobook
"A compelling, honest, inspiring and entertaining writing style with a built-in feel-good factor" Get them NOW from the authors' website and Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.co.uk.
Back Road Map Books and Backroad GPS Maps for all of Canada - a must have!
New to Horizons Unlimited?
New to motorcycle travelling? New to the HU site? Confused? Too many options? It's really very simple - just 4 easy steps!
Horizons Unlimited was founded in 1997 by Grant and Susan Johnson following their journey around the world on a BMW R80G/S.
Read more about Grant & Susan's story
Membership - help keep us going!
Horizons Unlimited is not a big multi-national company, just two people who love motorcycle travel and have grown what started as a hobby in 1997 into a full time job (usually 8-10 hours per day and 7 days a week) and a labour of love. To keep it going and a roof over our heads, we run events all over the world with the help of volunteers; we sell inspirational and informative DVDs; we have a few selected advertisers; and we make a small amount from memberships.
You don't have to be a Member to come to an HU meeting, access the website, or ask questions on the HUBB. What you get for your membership contribution is our sincere gratitude, good karma and knowing that you're helping to keep the motorcycle travel dream alive. Contributing Members and Gold Members do get additional features on the HUBB. Here's a list of all the Member benefits on the HUBB.
|
|
|