Quote:
Originally Posted by *Touring Ted*
The problem there is that there is no way to justify someones judgement or remark.
Some honest and to the book testers could be slammed because the guy didn't like the fact he rode 20 miles in the rain to get failed for a dangerous bag of nails.
Unfortunately, a lot of bikers are arseholes.
|
that's true but that's why you'd need a system to evaluate reports and look for patterns; if a dozen people say the same thing about one test place then its likely they're onto something, whereas if most feedback is positive but one grunt moans about his rust bucket failing then his bias should be clear.
It just strikes me that most things are peer reviewed on the net these days, from hotels to shops to eating places. I can't see why MOT testers can't be dealt with the same way.
Anyway its probably a bit off topic here. If I had the requisite skills I'd set it up myself, but alas...
__________________
That concrete whizzing by five inches below your foot is the real thing...
|