Why are you guys ganging up on me? Because I said that this guy committed a felony and there is no solution for it?
Because I dared to suggest that he was stupid in doing so?
Why you guys have to express opinion about my post instead of you, yourselves, giving all that wealth of information that you are saying my post lacks?
There is no legal solution to this guys problem. Period.
My post was very clear, implicitly as to forget about the bond; explicitly, advising Waztafel not to go back to South Africa.
Are the posts suggesting new felonies a positive solution?
As per the subject of helping someone in need even if it is unlawful, I can think of a whole bunch of people needing your encouragement also.
Am I hallucinating, or Waztafel fessed in here that he broke South African law? He smuggled a bike into the country and sold it for financial benefit.
I do not think the HUBB should allow the publication of this and least the 'helpful' responses.
Where do we draw the line? "Accidental" smuggling is ok, what about "accidental" hit and run?
|