I think its just a simplification of all the compliance problems stacking up for a very old design , that would be too complicated for the understanding of the general public , so you need to keep the message easy to understand .
The bigger concern is what are they going to replace it with , in a way same as nothing has replaced Concord ! Its going to be a hard act to follow . In one way its a relief as it was slowly being damaged by the way it was developing (going backwards rather than forward when looking at its original appeal and utility) JMHO
|