Think I may have over cooked the planning and research for my main trip this year. Before I have even left I'm starting to feel like I've done it. I'm sure once on the way (Sept ) it will be fine.

Its just a competitively small one looking at some reports on here, a 3+ week UK-Geneva Switz.-Italy-(Ferry)Croatia-Slovenia-Austria-Germany-France-UK

Found loads of things to see on the way round etc .......I'm sure it will be great.

Have I overdosed on this trip before its happened, anyone else suffered this I wonder. What happened?

I was doing the same thing with my little 30 day trip to the Arctic. So I threw most of the planning out the window and will take it one day at a time.

I think that all you can do is make a list of the highlights that you really do not want to miss. Make it a short list so that you have time for detours, breakdowns, hangovers and chilling out with folks you meet along the way.

With no plan at all, you could find a lot of backtracking and huge numbers of kilometers without seeing anything, and be driving right past some really cool stuff.

We start off to a country with a short list of highlights, and make the rest up as we go along. Works for us!

Merv.

I did not explain or write that first post very well. Let me try and clarify what I was trying to say.

I have "planned" the countries and areas I may pass through and "researched" POI along the routes. I haven't done any "detailed planning" such as times/dates/places/hotels/campsites or anything really ( I hardly ever do)

I totally agree with Mervifwdc and his comments its pretty much what I've always done. - Go armed with info so you don't miss that Roman ruin 5km off route!

My question was more regarding the feeling that I have "already been there" due largely to the research I suppose: thanks to the internet you can "see" it all with out being there. ( not literally all .........obviously that would be ridiculous on my slow broadband )

It may pose the question whether you need go at all?
Silly of course you should go !

There will certainly be times that I "find" something en-route quite breathtaking. Similarly there may be occasions when I visit something and it isn't quite as breathtaking as I expected, due to, too much " research" .......perhaps?

Must be having a bad day and can't get away until September...............all getting too much. I'll be fine in the morning

I tend to think it does not matter how much planning you do, or how much you know about the places you want to visit. If anything, it improves the trip. The one thing I tend to do is half research something, visit the place, and find out there is so much more about it when I look it up, that I wish I had known when I visited.

No matter how much research you do, it will never give you the sights, sounds and atmosphere of actually being there. That, to me, is what gives travellers their different outlook on life, to someone who knows every detail about everything, but has learned most of it off a computer screen.

Yep, you can over plan a trip, I call it procrastination, well that's my excuse anyway.
I now plan where I'd like to go, how much it should cost and when I'd like to be home, that's it as for the rest, well, let the wind of chance take care of that.

__________________
I once ruled the world, till mum told me it was only the garden!

This aspect of travel is explored quite philosophically in the book 'Skating to Antarctica'. (Jenny Diski, available secondhand for a couple of pounds).
It's autobiographical about the author's early life, and a package trip she did to Antarctica much later.

She has deep discussions with her daughter about whether or not to take a camera to Antarctica, arguing somewhat persuasively that to bring back photos of places you visit only distorts your own inner memories of those places.
Also, about how the actions of over-enthusiastic photo-snappers can affect the enjoyment of other visitors.

She then expands that argument into suggesting you should never look at pictures of any distant places that you may visit one day, because when you get there you won't be truly seeing the place for the first time. Do your research from text only, no photos. A bit difficult to do, as she discusses, and asks the OP's question:

Interesting stuff if you're thinking about what research to do before going places.

(If you consider buying this book, the discussions I mention above only comprise about 3 or 4 pages in all, but are still pretty interesting despite that).

__________________
TTR250 - London to Cape Town

sounds like a load of pretentious anally retentive bull to me!

A good plan rarely survives first contact with the enemy!

I'm well aware of those arguements and it's something I've pondered about over the years but I've come to the opposite conclusion. There are downsides to having a permanent record of a transient experience but without photographs my own inner memories end up so distorted with the passage of time that often they're hardly worth having. The photographs act as anchor points, a means of distinguishing between memories and dreams. And as the decades have rolled on some of the earlier ones have taken on a life of their own as the associated memories have faded to the point where, although I know I took them, that person is now someone else, almost a stranger. Sometimes I look at them and feel I'm intruding. I don't think it's Dementia

My conclusion - photograph everything to the point where it starts interfering with the trip. Five years later you'll be pleased you did. Similarly with planning - plan to the level you're comfortable with. If you've overdone it you probably won't next time. Some of my early trips were planned to the point where I can still recite the routing instructions through France like a mantra. I do the same trip now with absolutely nothing planned other than booking the ferry in advance because it's cheaper.