The emissions requirement as far as the MoT is concerned is on it's way. However, that and getting another 5mpg is kind of pointless given the huge number of imports from countries that are knocking out 125's and 50cc scoots as cheaply as possibly with total disregard for the environment.
Not sure sure about automatic gearboxes. If you don't know what gear you need to be in, you don't belong on a bike.
Totally agree on the useability of power. Try riding a late model Yamaha R6. It's all top end and you need to be dancing on the shift lever to the get the best out of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warthog
The downside for me is that a lot of custmers are looking at bikes, not for a purpose, but for an image. If the bike fits that image, they are happy. Unfortunately, the image sought is rarely: "my bike is a picture of efficiency!
|
Exactly.
I sold an early R1 recently. Speaking to the customer, it was quite clear what he really wanted was the VFR800 he tried but the pose value of the R1 made the choice for him. Sad thing is, across a typical sunday bikers route, he would probably be quicker on the VFR. :confused1:
However, you could say the same about BMW GS buyers. There's loads of low milers around in immaculate condition. How many of them are bought as a pose and will never go further off road than a field on a campsite in which case, an R1200RT, Pan-European or even a Fazer would be a better choice.
Just thought I'd chuck that in before everyone starts pointing the finger at sportsbikers.
|