Transalp new or F650 Dakar

[Axel]

I've been waiting 10 years to get a decent bike and that day should finally come in a week or two! Beyond that excitation I still have no clear answer as for my definite choice... should I got for a Transalp (650) or GS650 Dakar (both new models)? I've been RTWing in the past on a 125cc and will do another trip in the future with my next bike. However in the meantime that bike should be able to take me to work and also to cover fair distances on the highway until...I finally take it for what it has been designed for! I understand throughout the web-site + the press that :

F650 Dakar: good for my height (1m85), small fuel consumption (+ longer range that Transalp), pretty decent off-road abilities, modern built engine + seems quite fun to ride... + I LIKE IT VERY MUCH... But how will this single cylinder engine look like in 3 to 4 years time when I decide to take it for long term travel?

Transalp 650: probably one of the most reliable trail bike still on production, no injection which is good for repairing etc... but a hell lot of plastics on new models, a small ground clearance and pretty unexciting to ride (?)...

Furthermore, what if I was considering long term duo travelling?

As anyone faced this exciting choice?? What did you finally go for? I would highly appreciate any recommendation from owners of either models or...both!

Cheers

[Sig Taylor]

Patrick,

You don' mention it below??? You've stated previously that it's great...have you changed your mind?

Here's a nice summary from this link:
http://multisurfacemotorcycling.com/msm.htm

Kawasaki KLR650

Pros:
- Roomy seating ergonomics (long seat for 2 people)
- Moderately powerful smooth running water cooled engine.
- Longest range in its class
- Easily serviced compared to others in its class

Con:
- Heavy
- Marginal stock front brake
- Weak suspension for serious off road riding or loads
(Can be corrected)
- Poor fit & finish* (varies from bike to bike)
- Balancer system prone to failure (Can be corrected with aftermarket parts)

Suzuki DR650

Pros:
- Peppy air/oil cooled engine
- Low oil consumption*
- Good front brake
- Excellent fit & finish
- Adjustable seat height!

Con:
- Tall 5th gear
- Harsh rear suspension
(Can be corrected)
- Short cruising range
- Cramped seating ergonomics for some riders
- Rear suspension linkage difficult to service
- Early models prone to blown base gaskets

Hope this helps!

Sig

[Lone Rider]

Originally Posted by Sig Taylor

................
Con:
- Tall 5th gear
..............

I really don't understand this as a complaint.
The bike's 5th lets you run at speed. Heck, I love it.

[Sig Taylor]

Patrick,

I loved the VSTROM but it was recommended that spoked wheels are the way to go RTW. In fact Hedge Peterson's tours won't "qualify" your bike (let you come) unless your bike has spoked wheels. It's for that reason only that I've been exploring other possibilities, none of which are "ideal" when compared to the Vstrom. Apparently, it just isn't realistic to change the wheels on the Vstrom to spokes. Too expensive, time consuming, etc.

Anyway, I'd love to do my adventure riding on a Vstrom! But...the cast wheels...

[Sig Taylor]

Here's what Eldon Carl has say to say about the DR350. Your thoughts?

http://multisurfacemotorcycling.com/...ltisurface.htm

If I had to pick the best all around weight category for a medium distance multi-surface motorcycling, I'd have to pick Light Heavyweight. My DR 350SE weights 335lbs full of gas, but with light wheels and good suspension at 11 inches of travel, the chassis doesn't get bumped around much. I was bothered by front-end push, but by increasing rake & trail slightly and installing D606's I now have the best all around light-heavyweight I've owned. If you want a great Multisurface Motorcycle, find a 94 to 99 DR350SE and get it set up correctly. Nothing new will match it in its category.

[Sig Taylor]

Interesting that the 1000 weighs only 30 lbs. more. Why not buy the 1000 although the 650 is plenty of bike for me. I assume it burns a little more fuel. How much?

You've not doubt address this question before.

[indu]

Interesting how a thread where a guy wants opinions on F650 Dakar vs Trans Alp ends up with a comparison between DL650 and 1000... ;-)

[MarkLG]

Originally Posted by indu

Interesting how a thread where a guy wants opinions on F650 Dakar vs Trans Alp ends up with a comparison between DL650 and 1000... ;-)

Well spotted.

Alex, of the 2 I'd go for the Honda. Better engine, better build quality and proven reliabilty. Like all BMW's the F650's are over-priced for what you're getting. If you're going travelling in 3-4 years then choose the bike that will better suit your needs now - you can always change it in a couple of years time. If you like the look of the Honda and like the way it rides then that's the one to go for - it may not be the most modern bike out there, but if you enjoy owning it then that's far more important than having the latest thing.

Never seen the point of those 650 VStroms - didn't they just drop the smaller engine into an identical chassis to the 1000? That way you end up with a bike the size and weight of a 1000, but with an underpowered 650 engine. I suppose they're OK if you needed a smaller bike due to the cost if insurance on the 1000, but otherwise why bother? Has anyone else noticed that those 650's weigh the same as a KTM950, or a 1200GS?

[colebatch]

Originally Posted by Axel

F650 Dakar: good for my height (1m85), small fuel consumption (+ longer range that Transalp), pretty decent off-road abilities, modern built engine + seems quite fun to ride... + I LIKE IT VERY MUCH... But how will this single cylinder engine look like in 3 to 4 years time when I decide to take it for long term travel?

Transalp 650: probably one of the most reliable trail bike still on production, no injection which is good for repairing etc... but a hell lot of plastics on new models, a small ground clearance and pretty unexciting to ride (?)...

I have ridden a 1993 TA from Tokyo to London and a 2002 F650 across South America ...

The F650 is a bit more pokey (being fuel injected) and has a vast range of aftermarket bits for it. The injection also doesnt need to be adjusted for altitude, which may be handy if you are planning a lot of high altitude riding, whereas the TAs carburettor may need to be rejetted as you go up and down.

The TA has a lot fewer aftermarket bits available for it. So it depends if equipping a bike to the max is part of your overall philosophy. The TA is beyond peer for reliability. My Tokyo to London run took 6 months, 25,000 klms and the bike didnt need anything but routine checking and the odd oil change, all on a 2nd hand 400cc TransAlp. Read the link below for more detail.

My experience with the F650 (also second hand) was of a less reliable bike. Maybe it was in worse condition when I got it, but I had electrical issues. Several days it needed to be clutch started (a bitch on flat terrain); batteries didnt charge properly; engine power varied from day to day ... some days were good days and some werent.

I think if you were going to get a new bike, I would go with the F650. If you want a uber reliable solid second hand platform and are not too worried about accessories and "decorations", then go for a pre 2000 600cc TA. It will be cheap, reliable and easy to work on.

There are few if any people who had done a long trip on a TA who will have bad words to say about it (apart from it could use a touch more power). F650 owners opinions are much more mixed.

[Axel]

Thanks guys for these good info. I finally went for a new Transalp and already love her. I think I made the good choice and can't wait until taking her for its first long ride. Happy new year to all, especially those on the road.

[BockingBandit]

Axel,.. good for you. The most suitable bike for traveling the world is the bike your most comfortable with. Lets face it, any choice of Bike is a compromise; though some are more 'compromised' than others. Now, .. just get on and enjoy it. All the Best

[Walkabout]

For a couple of more 2 cents worth:

On occasions, I ride (tarmac only) a standard F650GS, two years old, that belongs to my wife; it always returns at least 70 MPG (that's a UK gallon) - about 15 miles per litre for the metric folk - so it gets to 200 miles before the fuel warning light comes on, at which point it has over a gallon of fuel remaining = about 260 miles on the standard 17 litre fuel tank.

The more I thrash the engine the better it goes; the bike loves to be revved, in some contrast to my own TT600R Yam which delivers the power in a very different manner.
Some people say they are "heavy" but there is rarely any mention of the CG as a factor; on the 650GS it is very low (see where the fuel tank is located) - the Yam is lighter overall but it feels heavier.

Never ridden a TA but I notice that the technology still has not changed!!

Dave

[pecha72]

1-cylinder GS will be better in the worst places you can go with a bike, but everywhere else, and especially 2-up, I´d go for a twin.

Dont mean to hijack threads, either, but I, too, would take a serious look at the DL650, if your considering a Transalp. Nothing at all against Honda, in fact i´ve had an Africa Twin, and ridden my friends Transalp for quite a while. If you just maintain them properly, you cant break them, which is excellent. But the XL´s just a very old construction these days.

If you really dont want fuel injection - personally I dont know if theres something to really worry about it nowadays - and want spoked wheels (which require maintenance, mind you!) with offroad-suited 21´´ in front, then it might be the right choice. But technically the Suzuki is miles ahead, especially the engine is a peach, and compared to it the XL´s just plain lazy. Were talking something like 20 horsepower here, which is a huge difference considering neither of these is a real "powerhouse" to begin with. If you load up both of them heavily, as you would when going on a big tour with 2-up, I would take the DL anytime over the XL (or even 650GS for that matter!)

Ive only ridden some 8.000 on my DL, but I had an SV before, which did 62.000 with absolutely zero problems, so I believe its just as bulletproof as the Honda. People seem to have done some very serious touring with the DL, and there have been very few complaints. Maybe its about time Honda did something to renew its big trailbikes.