Quote:
Originally Posted by Homers GSA
Just my thoughts.
We are obsessed with weight, as if weight is always a bad thing.
Weight, or mass, dampens vibrations and can make the riding experience for the 98% of riding much more enjoyable.
Compare these two bikes;
2025 KTM390 Adv
1995 Kawasaki KLE500
Both 21 / 18 wheels
Both 44hp
15 and 14l tanks
Both 6 speeds
2” more travel for KTM
Here’s the wet weight comparison;
KTM is 165kg
KLE is 178kg
So 13kg difference.
That 13kg gives you a larger capacity smoother twin cylinder engine and a larger frame with a more comfortable seating position.
If you watch the last video in your post check out the vibrations in his arms at 90kmh, and the acute angle of his knees.
Just a few thoughts sitting back with a few data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77894/77894eb84dc775a587d2249ae1a2afd5f7e9ed25" alt="beer" s data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77894/77894eb84dc775a587d2249ae1a2afd5f7e9ed25" alt="beer"
|
Thanks for your thoughts, just as valid as others thoughts so thanks for sharing.
If I may share some thoughts as well (after all I started this thread…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/187b2/187b2b4ba9b6c3cf729dca9eef281ba4e7173286" alt="Innocent"
)
First - the Kawasaki Kle500 you refer to - I have no experiences whatsoever with that bike, I dont think I have ever seen one irl. But the reviews I have read were all eh… quite negative - to put it mildly. Especially the engine seems to get bad mentions… MCN particularly didnt like it:
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-...i/kle500/1991/
Weight - yes maybe we have come to the point that we focus too much on weight….? User «NatetheNomad» posted a thread on Horizons Facebook-site that he wanted a 500 cc bike with approx 50 HP, with 23 liter fuel capacity and a weight at max 135 kilos/300 lbs - and not this new approx 180 kilos KTM 390 ADV….. So it shows that some riders wants really lightweigt travel bikes.
However I think specs like that will never happen on an oem bike….
Now when I am closer to 60 than 50 years of age I have contemplated a few things in my life - and one of the main things is that - get rid of unneccesary things. And that is valid for all situations in life. Unnecessary stuff, unnecessary expenses, unneccesary obligations, unnecessary size and weight - and the list goes on. Simply because they are that - unnecessary!
For a travel/overland bike weight is important, not as important as for an enduro/dual sport bike - but still important. Because when the going gets though - weight matters a lot! But for a travel/overland bike there are other features that also matters, reliability, ease of service and service intervals, spare parts availability, luggage carrying capacity etc etc.
Riding around the globe with a lot of unnecessary weight is quite obviously unnecessary! Thats why I have come to find that lighter bikes is favourable for many obvious reasons when we are talking about travel/overland bikes. Bikes for general touring or orher useage - weight isnt that important.
I noticed the new KTM390 ADV have underbelly exhaust - which is good as it makes carrying luggage on the sides easier and more conveniant either one uses soft or hard luggage.
But I admit the specsheet that tells that this new KTM is 182 kilos kerb weight was a tad disappointing. But the new 390 still have many great features afaik.
We will see how popular it gets (and what happens with KTM in general….)
Just a few thoughts after a cup of morning coffee…
Excuse my english skills as I am not a native english speaker
Photo: Touring two-up in Thailand on a Honda Crf250L that costed me 79000 baht (2315 USD, 2230 Euro) with 50 Euro sidebags. Cruises at 85 km/h and gets 100 mpg imperial.
Cost effective touring/unnecessary costs cut!