Bandit 127,
Have you ever considered MICHELIN SIRAC's?
These things are more agricultural looking than a Tourance and quite a bit cheaper too.
Personally I find so called "all round" tyres a bit misleading because in my opinion these tyres do not perform excellently at either discipline (tarmac or off-road). I describe most as 70% tarmac, 30% LIGHT trails. Forget these tyres for hard-core off-road stuff because they ALL fail miserably to get traction in wet muddy conditions.
Knobblies are the ONLY things to use off-road.
I suppose what I'm trying to say (badly), is that we all need to work out what we do most of the time and make an informed decision on what tyre we choose.... Does that make any sense????????
I choose Michelin SIRAC's simply because I think a XT needs to have agricultural looking tyres to look the part. Plain tarmac tyres (including in my opinion Tourance's) spoil the look of the thing.
My mate laughs at me because I never get my bikes wet or muddy. Thing is, I love to keep my bikes looking pristine (XT's in this kind of condition are becoming quite rare now). Give it a few more years and XT600E's will become very sought after (and good investments).
Just read what I have written and now even I'm confused.
__________________
Triumph Bonneville 800 (2004), Yamaha XT600E (1999), Honda XBR500 (1986).
|